A practical survey of fertility‐preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan. Issue 5 (10th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Takae, Seido; Kato, Keiichi; Watanabe, Chie; Nara, Kazuko; Koizumi, Tomoe; Kawai, Kiyotaka; Ota, Kuniaki; Yumura, Yasushi; Yabuuchi, Akiko; Kuwahara, Akira; Furui, Tatsuro; Takai, Yasushi; Irahara, Minoru; Suzuki, Nao
• Is Part Of: Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. Volume 48:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 1061
• Page End: 1075
• Publication Date: 2022-03-10
• Subjects: cancer survivor -- fertility preservation -- oncofertility -- oocyte cryopreservation -- ovarian tissue cryopreservation; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; 618.1005
• DOI: 10.1111/jog.15199
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1341-8076

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: The actual status of fertility preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan was investigated as a basis for discussing future directions. Methods: This study was conducted as "Research project to promote support of children and parenting 2016" which was supported by Ministry of Health in Japan with the approval of the institutional review board at St. Marianna University. Subjects of the survey were facilities registered with the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology as fertility preservation facilities, and facilities belonging to the Japan Association of Private Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics and Laboratories. We provided questionnaires to survey both the medical care system and cases for which fertility preservation was implemented between 2006 and 2016. Results: Responses were obtained from 68 facilities (of the 64, 59 [92.2%] responded to the questionnaire and 9 clinics cooperated). Many facilities limited the cryopreservation of oocytes and ovaries to patients 40–41 years old and the use of eggs to patients 44–45 years old. In the patient survey, 812 cases of oocyte cryopreservation and 201 cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were performed during study period. Breast cancer was the most indicated disease, with oocyte cryopreservation in the late 30s and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in the early 30s. Very few babies were born from fertility preservation, and no live birth cases of ovarian tissue cryopreservation were identified. Conclusions: Even from the early days, fertility preservation was implemented according to certain standards in Japan, but was characterized by a large variety of facilities.