Bessel-Gauss beams in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory using three remodeling techniques. (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Valdivia, Nereida L.; Votto, Luiz F.M.; Gouesbet, Gérard; Wang, Jiajie; Ambrosio, Leonardo A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer. Volume 256(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Generalized Lorenz-Mie theory -- Beam shape coefficients -- Finite series method -- Localized approximations -- Bessel-Gauss beams; Spectrum analysis -- Periodicals; Radiation -- Periodicals; Analyse spectrale -- Périodiques; Rayonnement -- Périodiques; Radiation; Spectrum analysis; Periodicals; 543.0858
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107292
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4073

Abstract

Highlights: Scalar Bessel-Gauss beams are described in the generalized Lorenz-Mie theory (GLMT). Beam shape coefficients are calculated using three remodeling techniques. Quadratures, finite series and localized approximations are compared for distinct topological charges and axicon angles. Examples of calculations of beam shape coefficients and remodeling of radial electric field component are presented. This work is an important contribution to the field and may also bring greater interest to the use of the finite series method to compute beam shape coefficients. Abstract: In the analysis of light scattering by small particles, the Generalized Lorenz-Mie Theory (GLMT) describes the incident beam with a set of Beam Shape Coefficients (BSCs) that can be calculated with three different approaches, viz., quadratures, finite series and localized approximations. Choosing between them may not be self-evident. A Bessel-Gauss beam (BGB) is a finite energy, physically realizable wave field resulting from the apodization of a Bessel beam by a Gaussian function. This paper provides a comparison between the aforementioned techniques for the evaluation of the BSCs of scalar BGBs with distinct axicon angles and confinement parameters, including field reconstructions. All three methods agree quite well in the paraxial regime, although as the axicon angle or the topological charge increases, differences in the BSCs for each method become more and more evident.