Dispatching citizens as first responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (10th March 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Dispatching citizens as first responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (10th March 2022)
- Main Title:
- Dispatching citizens as first responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Scquizzato, Tommaso
Belloni, Olivia
Semeraro, Federico
Greif, Robert
Metelmann, Camilla
Landoni, Giovanni
Zangrillo, Alberto - Abstract:
- Abstract : Mobile phone technologies to alert citizen first responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) were implemented in numerous countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate whether activating citizen first responders increases bystanders' interventions and improves outcomes. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 24 November 2021, for studies comparing citizen first responders' activation versus standard emergency response in the case of OHCA. The primary outcome was survival at hospital discharge or 30 days. Secondary outcomes were discharge with favourable neurological outcome, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) before ambulance arrival. Evidence certainty was evaluated with GRADE. Our search strategy yielded 1215 articles. After screening, we included 10 studies for a total of 23 351 patients. OHCAs for which citizen first responders were activated had higher rates of survival at hospital discharge or 30 days compared with standard emergency response [nine studies; 903/9978 (9.1%) vs. 1104/13 247 (8.3%); odds ratio (OR), 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21–1.74; P < 0.001], return of spontaneous circulation [nine studies; 2575/9169 (28%) vs. 3445/12 607 (27%); OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.07–1.81; P = 0.01], bystander-initiated CPR [eight studies; 5876/9074 (65%) vs. 6384/11 970 (53%); OR, 1.75;Abstract : Mobile phone technologies to alert citizen first responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) were implemented in numerous countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to investigate whether activating citizen first responders increases bystanders' interventions and improves outcomes. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 24 November 2021, for studies comparing citizen first responders' activation versus standard emergency response in the case of OHCA. The primary outcome was survival at hospital discharge or 30 days. Secondary outcomes were discharge with favourable neurological outcome, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) before ambulance arrival. Evidence certainty was evaluated with GRADE. Our search strategy yielded 1215 articles. After screening, we included 10 studies for a total of 23 351 patients. OHCAs for which citizen first responders were activated had higher rates of survival at hospital discharge or 30 days compared with standard emergency response [nine studies; 903/9978 (9.1%) vs. 1104/13 247 (8.3%); odds ratio (OR), 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21–1.74; P < 0.001], return of spontaneous circulation [nine studies; 2575/9169 (28%) vs. 3445/12 607 (27%); OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.07–1.81; P = 0.01], bystander-initiated CPR [eight studies; 5876/9074 (65%) vs. 6384/11 970 (53%); OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.43–2.15; P < 0.001], and AED use [eight studies; 654/9132 (7.2%) vs. 624/14 848 (4.2%); OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.31–2.53; P < 0.001], but similar rates of neurological intact discharge [three studies; 316/2685 (12%) vs. 276/2972 (9.3%); OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.81–2.33; P = 0.24]. Alerting citizen first responders to OHCA patients is associated with higher rates of bystander-initiated CPR, use of AED before ambulance arrival, and survival at hospital discharge or 30 days. Abstract : … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of emergency medicine. Volume 29:Number 3(2022)
- Journal:
- European journal of emergency medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Number 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0029-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 163
- Page End:
- 172
- Publication Date:
- 2022-03-10
- Subjects:
- app -- automated external defibrillator -- basic life support -- first responders -- out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Emergency medicine -- Europe -- Periodicals
Medical emergencies -- Europe -- Periodicals
Emergency medical services -- Europe -- Periodicals
Emergencies -- Europe -- Periodicals
Emergency Medical Services -- Europe -- Periodicals
Emergency Medicine -- Europe -- periodicals
616.025 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/euro-emergencymed/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000915 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0969-9546
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.728600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21406.xml