Rapid identification of bacteria directly from positive blood cultures by a modified method using a serum separator tube and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization – time of flight MS. Issue 12 (23rd December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carretero, Octavio; Rivas, Gonzalo; Loras, Cristina; Orellana, M. Angeles
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical microbiology. Volume 69:Issue 12(2020)
• Page Start: 1373
• Page End: 1380
• Publication Date: 2020-12-23
• Subjects: blood culture -- direct identification -- MALDI-TOF -- serum separator tube; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; 616.9041
• DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001270
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-2615

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction. Several studies have used matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight MS (MALDI-TOF) with a serum separator tube (SST) to perform rapid identification of microorganisms directly from positive blood cultures (BCs), with different performances and methodologies. Hypothesis / Gap Statement. The use of TSS could significantly reduce the time of identification of microorganisms that produce bacteremia. Aim. Our goals were to evaluate bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF using a method based on an SST and compare it with MALDI-TOF after subculture for 18–24 h. Methodology. BCs no more than 1 h after a positive growth signal were included in the study. Analysis of results was expressed as a score. Information about time to a positive signal and number of microorganisms was collected. Results. In total, 253 BCs were analysed; 45.5 % gave a reliable result, 23.3 % an unreliable result and 31.2 % an error in identification. In gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, the percentages of reliable results were 83.5 and 21.8 %, respectively. According to time to positive signal, the percentages of correct identification and mean score were 81.1 % (99/122) and 1.89±0.30 in Group 1 (<15 h); and 57.2 % (75/131) and 1.70±0.32 in Group 2 (>15 h), respectively ( P <0.001). According to the number of microorganisms, the corresponding percentages of correct identification and mean scores were: Group 1 [≤50 microorganisms observed per field (MOF)], 50/94 (53.19 %) and 1.72±0.32; Group 2 (51–100 MOF): 44/66 (66.67 %) and 1.85±0.34; Group 3 (>100 MOF): 79/93 (84.94 %) and 1.84±0.31. Conclusion. This method allowed us to obtain a high percentage of the aetiological agent of bacteraemia in less than 30 min after a positive BC.