Cross-sectional International Multicenter Study on Quality of Life and Reasons for Abandonment of Upper Limb Prostheses. Issue 5 (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yamamoto, Michiro; Chung, Kevin C.; Sterbenz, Jennifer; Shauver, Melissa J.; Tanaka, Hirotaka; Nakamura, Takashi; Oba, Jumpei; Chin, Takaaki; Hirata, Hitoshi
• Is Part Of: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 7:Issue 5(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; 617.95205
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002205
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-7574

Abstract

Abstract : Background: This multicenter study aimed to examine the reasons for prosthesis rejection and assess the quality of life (QOL) among patients with upper limb deficiency. Methods: Three rehabilitation centers in Japan and 1 academic medical center in the United States participated. Patients between the age of 12 and 75 years with unilateral or bilateral upper limb absence from the level of wrist to shoulder disarticulation were included. Two questionnaires were used, an original questionnaire on prosthesis use and the EQ-5D, which were completed by both the participant and a live-in proxy. Results: Of the 367 patients with upper limb loss invited, 174 patients participated in this study. Eighty percent of the study population were male patients. The most common amputation level was transradial. Trauma was the most common cause of limb loss. The prosthesis rejection rate was 9% (n = 16). The most common reason for abandonment was a lack of prosthesis functionality. Ten of 16 prosthesis nonusers (63%) and 59 prosthesis users (38%) were unemployed or students. The mean EQ-5D utility score was significantly higher in prosthesis users than in nonusers (0.762 versus 0.628, P < 0.01). Live-in proxies significantly overestimated QOL in male patients (0.77 versus 0.807, P =0.01). Conclusions: The current prosthesis rejection rate is low. QOL was significantly higher in prosthesis users than in nonusers. More prosthesis users were employed compared with nonusers. Care should be taken not to overestimate the QOL of male patients with upper limb loss as their proxies often did.