Planning for historic urban environments under austerity conditions: Insights from post-crash Ireland. (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Scott, Mark; Parkinson, Arthur; Waldron, Richard; Redmond, Declan
• Is Part Of: Cities. Volume 103(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: Conservation-planning -- Austerity -- Heritage -- Regeneration -- Ireland; City planning -- Periodicals; Urban policy -- Periodicals; 711.4
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102788
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-2751

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, we examine how conservation-planning and local regeneration in historic urban cores have been re-shaped under austerity conditions and how local planners and local government more generally have negotiated or navigated this emerging austerity terrain. We seek to contribute to wider debates on 'austerity urbanism', by examining the impacts of austerity on local planning and how planning officials have attempted to moderate austerity largely imposed by central government (entrenched roll-back neoliberalism) but often through the further roll-out of neoliberalism in local growth strategies. Drawing on the experience of three Irish urban centres, we examine efforts to 'sell' the historic city. Both nationally and within the three case study areas, a common overarching theme was evident in the initial post-crisis response to urban development: an emphasis on utilising heritage as a potential economic regeneration pathway. However, while drawing on intangible heritage and heritage narratives for place-branding, the actual protection of tangible built heritage assets was undermined through a greater emphasis on 'flexible' planning responses to managing heritage, which seek to minimise barriers to development. Highlights: Examines how conservation and regeneration in historic urban environments have been reshaped by the politics of austerity. We argue that heritage narratives have become central to local growth strategies and in efforts to 'sell' the historic city. However, actual management of tangible built heritage assets has been undermined by austerity measures. Heritage framed as an economic opportunity, but heritage protection viewed as a cost and barrier to development.