Comparison of two types of matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer for the identification and typing ofClostridium difficile. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of two types of matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer for the identification and typing ofClostridium difficile. Issue 10 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of two types of matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer for the identification and typing ofClostridium difficile
- Authors:
- Kiyosuke, Makiko
Kibe, Yasushi
Oho, Megumi
Kusaba, Koji
Shimono, Nobuyuki
Hotta, Taeko
Kang, Dongchon
Shoubuike, Takeo
Miyamoto, Hiroshi - Abstract:
- Abstract : N/A: Microflex LT (Bruker Daltonics) and VITEK MS (bioMérieux) are bacterial identification systems that are based on matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF MS). For VITEK MS, two identification softwares, VITEK MS IVD (IVD) and SARAMIS (SARAMIS), are available. Microflex LT is equipped with MALDI Biotyper RTC software (Biotyper). Although the identification accuracy of each instrument has been compared for various bacteria, no detailed examination has been conducted for the identification accuracy of Clostridium difficile . In this report, we compared the three identification softwares for identification reproducibility in three ATCC C. difficile strains and identification accuracy in 50 clinical C. difficile isolates. The results showed 100, 91.7 and 100 % identification reproducibility accuracy of ATCC strains when examined by IVD, SARAMIS and Biotyper software, respectively. For the identification of the clinical isolates, all three softwares exhibited satisfactory identification accuracy of C. difficile. Among the 50 clinical isolates, seven showed identical toxin genotype corresponding to the exact ribotype. However, MALDI‐TOF MS failed to identify them as the identical type. Based on the above results, we concluded that both types of MALDI‐TOF MS reproducibly identified C. difficile ; however, they are currently not suitable for typing of C. difficile clones.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical microbiology. Volume 64:Issue 10(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical microbiology
- Issue:
- Volume 64:Issue 10(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 64, Issue 10 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 64
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0064-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
616.9041 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/jmm ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1099/jmm.0.000136 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-2615
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 21383.xml