Classification of flotation frothers – A statistical approach. (2nd February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Saavedra Moreno, Yesenia; Bournival, Ghislain; Ata, Seher
• Is Part Of: Chemical engineering science. Volume 248:Part B(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-02-02
• Subjects: Frother -- Foam stability -- Frother classification -- Principal component analysis -- Hierarchical cluster analysis; Chemical engineering -- Periodicals; Génie chimique -- Périodiques; Chemical engineering; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 660
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117252
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-2509

Abstract

Highlights: A framework for classifying non-ionic frothers using seven frother characteristics. Frothers were classified into four groups based on the similarities. Powerful frothers produced stable foams under dynamic and static conditions. An increase in molecular weight showed that frothers became more powerful. Abstract: This paper presents a statistical study to classify non-ionic frothers based on seven frother characteristics, molecular weight (MW), hydrophile–lipophile balance (HLB), critical coalescence concentration (CCC), the minimum sauter mean diameter (DL ), dynamic foam stability index (DFI), static foam stability index (SFI), and decay rate index (DRI). A principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to transform the seven frother characteristics into uncorrelated variables called principal components. The first principal component already explained 64.4% of the variance, and the addition of the second and third principal components explained 92.1% of the variance. A hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was conducted using the first three principal components. The Euclidean distance, which is the square distance between the standardised coordinates of two frothers in a generalised parameter space, was calculated for all frothers. At a Euclidean distance of 4, frothers were grouped into four groups, in which Group 1 consisted of the most powerful frothers that produced stable foams and Group 4 was composed of weakest frothers.