Cell-free DNA analysis in maternal blood: comparing genome-wide versus targeted approach as a first-line screening test. (2nd November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Wergifosse, Sidonie; Bevilacqua, Elisa; Mezela, Iris; El Haddad, Sarah; Gounongbe, Caroline; de Marchin, Jérôme; Maggi, Valeria; Conotte, Stéphanie; Badr, Dominique A.; Fils, Jean-François; Guizani, Meriem; Jani, Jacques C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 34:Number 21(2021)
• Page Start: 3552
• Page End: 3561
• Publication Date: 2021-11-02
• Subjects: Common trisomies -- comparing methodologies -- genome-wide cell-free DNA test -- partial imbalances -- rare autosomal monosomy -- rare autosomal trisomies -- targeted cell-free DNA test; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Perinatology -- Periodicals; Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neonatology -- Periodicals; 618.2
• DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1686478
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-7058

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the failure rate and performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing as a first-line screening method for major trisomies, performed by two laboratories using different analytical methods: a targeted chromosome-selective method (Harmony ® prenatal Test) versus a home-brew genome-wide (GW) massively parallel sequencing method (HB-cfDNA test), and to evaluate the clinical value of incidental findings for the latter method. Methods: CfDNA testing was performed in 3137 pregnancies with the Harmony ® prenatal Test and in 3373 pregnancies with the HB-cfDNA test. Propensity score analysis was used to match women between both groups for maternal age, weight, gestational age at testing, in vitro fertilization, rate of twin pregnancies and that of aneuploidies. Detection rates for trisomy 21 were compared between the 2 laboratories. For the HB-cfDNA test, cases with rare incidental findings were reported, including their clinical follow-up. Results: The Harmony ® prenatal Test failed at the first attempt in 90 (2.9%) of 3114 women and the HB-cfDNA test in 413 (12.2%) of 3373 women. Postmatched comparisons of the women's characteristics indicate a significantly lower failure rate in the Harmony ® group (2.8%) than in the HB cfDNA group (12.4%; p < .001). Of the 90 women in whom the Harmony ® prenatal Test failed, 61 had a repeat test, which still failed in 10, and of the 413 women in whom the HB-cfDNA test failed, 379 had a repeat test, which still failed in 110. The total failure rate after one or two attempts was therefore 1.3% (39/3114) for Harmony ® and 4.3% (144/3373) for the HB cfDNA test. After the first or second Harmony ® prenatal Test, a high-risk result was noted in 17 of the 17 cases with trisomy 21, in 5 of the seven cases with trisomy 18, and a no-call in two cases, and in the one case with trisomy 13. The respective numbers for the HB-cfDNA test are 17 of the 18 cases with trisomy 21, and a no-call in one case, 2 of the two cases with trisomy 18, and in 2 of the three cases with trisomy 13, and a no-call in one. Of the 3373 women with the HB-cfDNA test, a rare incidental finding was noted in 28 (0.8%) of the cases, of which only 2 were confirmed on amniocytes (one with microduplication 1q21.1q21.2 and one with a deletion Xp21.1), and in another case a deletion rather than a duplication of the long arm of chromosome 8 was found. In all 28 cases, there was normal clinical follow-up. Conclusions: Comparison of cfDNA testing between these two laboratories showed a four-fold lower failure rate with the Harmony ® prenatal Test, with a similar detection rate for trisomy 21. We showed no clinical relevance of disclosing additional findings beyond common trisomies with the GW HB-cfDNA test.