Testing-Related Health Impact of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy as Assessed by Health Utilities. Issue 6 (21st December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Testing-Related Health Impact of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy as Assessed by Health Utilities. Issue 6 (21st December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Testing-Related Health Impact of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy as Assessed by Health Utilities
- Authors:
- Shankar, Prasad R.
Ellimoottil, Chad
George, Arvin K.
Hadj-Moussa, Miriam
Modi, Parth K.
Salami, Simpa
Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
Wei, John T.
Davenport, Matthew S. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: We sought to assess the temporary health-related quality of life (health utility) of nonmagnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: This is a 2-arm, prospectively enrolled, observational, patient-reported outcomes study, performed between June 2019 and November 2020 at a single academic medical center. Inclusion criteria were men undergoing an outpatient ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (transrectal or transperineal approach, without magnetic resonance imaging guidance). Patients with a history of Gleason 7+ prostate cancer were excluded. Validated survey instruments were utilized to assess baseline (Short Form 12) and testing-related (Testing Morbidities Index [TMI]) health utility states. The primary outcome was the TMI summary testing-related quality-of-life score (summary utility score; scale: 0=death and 1=perfect health). The TMI is comprised of 7 domains, spanning before, during and after testing experiences. Each domain is scored from 1 (no health impact) to 5 (extreme health impact). Testing-related quality-of-life measures were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Enrollment rates were 80% (60/75; transrectal) and 86% (60/70; transperineal). All patients (120/120) completed the questionnaire. The TMI summary score for transrectal biopsy was not significantly different from transperineal biopsy (0.86, 95% CI 0.84–0.88 vs 0.83, 95% CI 0.81–0.85; p=0.0774). The largest differenceAbstract : Purpose: We sought to assess the temporary health-related quality of life (health utility) of nonmagnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: This is a 2-arm, prospectively enrolled, observational, patient-reported outcomes study, performed between June 2019 and November 2020 at a single academic medical center. Inclusion criteria were men undergoing an outpatient ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (transrectal or transperineal approach, without magnetic resonance imaging guidance). Patients with a history of Gleason 7+ prostate cancer were excluded. Validated survey instruments were utilized to assess baseline (Short Form 12) and testing-related (Testing Morbidities Index [TMI]) health utility states. The primary outcome was the TMI summary testing-related quality-of-life score (summary utility score; scale: 0=death and 1=perfect health). The TMI is comprised of 7 domains, spanning before, during and after testing experiences. Each domain is scored from 1 (no health impact) to 5 (extreme health impact). Testing-related quality-of-life measures were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Enrollment rates were 80% (60/75; transrectal) and 86% (60/70; transperineal). All patients (120/120) completed the questionnaire. The TMI summary score for transrectal biopsy was not significantly different from transperineal biopsy (0.86, 95% CI 0.84–0.88 vs 0.83, 95% CI 0.81–0.85; p=0.0774). The largest difference in the testing experiences was related to intraprocedural pain (transrectal biopsy: 2.3, 95% CI 2.1–2.4; transperineal biopsy: 2.9, 95% CI 2.6–3.1; p <0.001). Conclusions: Transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies have similar effect on temporary health-related quality-of-life. Transient differences relate to intraprocedural pain. These data can inform clinical decision making and future cost-utility models. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of urology. Volume 206:Issue 6(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of urology
- Issue:
- Volume 206:Issue 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 206, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 206
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0206-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 1403
- Page End:
- 1410
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12-21
- Subjects:
- quality of life -- prostatic neoplasms -- biopsy -- diagnostic techniques and procedures
Genitourinary organs -- Periodicals
Urology -- Periodicals
Urology -- Periodicals
Urologie -- Périodiques
Urologie
616.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1754854.html ↗
http://www.jurology.com ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00225347 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/JU.0000000000002118 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-5347
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5071.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21351.xml