Can conservatives who (de)humanize immigrants the most be able to support them? The power of imagined positive contact. Issue 5 (7th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Borinca, Islam; Çelik, Pinar; Storme, Martin
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied social psychology. Volume 52:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 363
• Page End: 375
• Publication Date: 2022-03-07
• Subjects: Social psychology -- Periodicals; Behavior -- Periodicals; Psychology, Social -- Periodicals; 302
• DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12864
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9029

Abstract

Abstract: Despite studies examining political ideology, group dehumanization, and intergroup contact as predictors of intergroup support and affect, research on their interplay in shaping such outcomes has been limited. In fact, considering the possibility that conservatives might view immigrants in various ways (as more or less human) is important to understand the impact of interventions (positive imagined contact) on intergroup relations. The results of two experiments ( N = 671) with U.S. citizens in relation to two outgroups— Muslim immigrants in Experiment 1 and Mexican immigrants in Experiment 2—consistently showed that imagined positive contact condition (vs. control/no contact condition) influenced intergroup support (i.e., in both experiments) and positive emotions (i.e., in Experiment 2) more for individuals who endorsed a conservative ideology and scored high for dehumanizing immigrants. Participants' willingness to attribute positive emotions to outgroup members ultimately explained the observed effects. In this research, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings for intergroup relations and outgroup dehumanization.