FRI0677 Prevalence and serological profile of anti-dfs70 positive subjects: data from a routine ana cohort. (12th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carbone, T.; Pafundi, V.; Tramontano, G.; Gilio, M.; Esposito, C.; Padula, M. C.; Padula, A. A.; D'Angelo, S.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 77(2018)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 858
• Page End: 858
• Publication Date: 2018-06-12
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-eular.6476
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Anti-Dense Fine Speckled 70 (DFS70) antibodies are a common finding in clinical laboratory referrals. High prevalence of DFS70 autoantibodies in healthy population and usual negative association with Antinuclear Antibody (ANA)-associated autoimmune rheumatic diseases were reported. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in a routine diagnostic laboratory setting and their association with other circulating serum autoantibodies. Methods: Consecutive sera submitted for ANA screening were analyzed for anti-DFS70 antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) (n=3175, 1030 men and 2145 women) then confirmed by Immunoblotting. IIF DFS70 positive adult patients were recruited previous written consent and tested for the following autoantibodies: anti-ENA, anti-dsDNA, -anti-TPO, anti-TG, anti-tTg, aCL, anti-PCA, AMA, ASMA, anti-LKM, anti-MPO, anti-PR3 and ASCAs. Results: The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies was 1.7% (n= 55) in the whole population and 4.6% in the ANA-positive samples. Comparison between DFS70 IIF and Immunoblotting showed an excellent correlation between the two methods (R=0.99). Analysis of anti-DFS70 antibodies titers distribution revealed that 63% of the total cohort showed high titers (³1:640). Gender difference (female: male, 4:1) was observed in anti-DFS70 positive group and in anti-DFS70 negative/ANA positive group. The prevalence of anti-DFS70 positive female (2.1%, 45/2145) was statistically significant higher than males (1.0%, 10/1030) (p<0.05). The comparison among referring sources evidenced a prevalence of anti-DFS70 positive subjects from Endocrinology Department (9.1% versus 2.6% from Haematology, 2.1% from outpatients, 1.6% from Neurology, 1.2% from Internal Medicine, 1% from Cardiology, 0.6% from Rheumatology). Of note, our data evidenced isolated reactivity of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in males group, while 51% of females showed concomitant disease-marker autoantibodies. Conclusions: We found a prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in adult sera from routine ANA cohort of 1.7%. The serological profile of DFS70-positive females required further investigations in order to define the presence of serum autoantibodies. Anti-DFS70 reactivity in male population may represent an exclusive biomarker predicting the absence of other autoantibodies. Acknowledgements: The authours would like to express their expecial appreciation and thanks to Prof. Ignazio Olivieri who died on July 28th, 2017. He was an example of strenght and tenacity with a contagious enthusiasm for a rigorous scientific research. Disclosure of Interest: None declared