Clinical evaluation of air polishing with erythritol powder followed by ultrasonic calculus removal versus conventional ultrasonic debridement and rubber cup polishing for the treatment of gingivitis: A split‐mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Issue 2 (28th July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical evaluation of air polishing with erythritol powder followed by ultrasonic calculus removal versus conventional ultrasonic debridement and rubber cup polishing for the treatment of gingivitis: A split‐mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Issue 2 (28th July 2021)
- Main Title:
- Clinical evaluation of air polishing with erythritol powder followed by ultrasonic calculus removal versus conventional ultrasonic debridement and rubber cup polishing for the treatment of gingivitis: A split‐mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
- Authors:
- Mensi, Magda
Scotti, Eleonora
Sordillo, Annamaria
Dalè, Matteo
Calza, Stefano - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the clinical efficacy in the short‐term resolution of gingivitis of a novel protocol involving full‐mouth erythritol powder air polishing followed by ultrasonic calculus removal. Methods: Forty‐one healthy patients completed the study. Following a split‐mouth design, quadrants 1–4 and 2–3 were randomly allocated to receive air polishing followed by ultrasonic calculus removal (A+US) or traditional full‐mouth ultrasonic debridement followed by polishing with a rubber cup and prophylactic paste (US+P). Bleeding on probing (BoP) and plaque index (PI) were collected at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks. Moreover, the residual plaque area (RPA), treatment time and patient comfort/satisfaction were evaluated at the end of the treatment. Results: Both treatments showed a significant reduction in BoP and PI. At 4 weeks, A+US seems to reach a statistically significant lower BoP (8.7% [6.9; 10.9] vs. 11.6%[9.3; 14.4], p < 0.0001) and PI (10.7% [8.9; 13.0] vs. 12.3% [10.2; 14.9], p = 0.033). Moreover, A+US treatment time lasted on average 9.2% less than US+P ( p < 0.0001) and was the preferred treatment for a significantly higher number of patients (73.2% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: The A+US protocol is suitable for the short‐term resolution of plaque‐induced gingivitis.
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of dental hygiene. Volume 20:Issue 2(2022)
- Journal:
- International journal of dental hygiene
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0020-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 371
- Page End:
- 380
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07-28
- Subjects:
- air polishing -- dental biofilm -- gingivitis -- oral hygiene -- plaque disclosing
Dental hygiene -- Periodicals
Dental hygienists -- Periodicals
617.60105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/rd.asp?goto=journal&code=idh ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/idh.12537 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1601-5029
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.184000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21360.xml