Airborne infection risk assessment of COVID-19 in an inpatient department through on-site occupant behavior surveys. (1st July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Jiaxiong; Li, Chunying; Tang, Haida
• Is Part Of: Journal of building engineering. Volume 51(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07-01
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- Infection risk -- Inpatient department -- Occupant behavior; Building -- Periodicals; 690.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104255
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-7102

Abstract

Abstract: Airborne transmission is a possible infection route of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This investigation focuses on the airborne infection risk of COVID-19 in a nursing unit in an inpatient building in Shenzhen, China. On-site measurements and questionnaire surveys were conducted to obtain the air change rates and occupant trajectories, respectively. The aerosol transport and dose–response models were applied to evaluate the infection risk. The average outdoor air change rate measured in the wards was 1.1 h −1, which is below the minimum limit of 2.0 h −1 required by ASHRAE 170–2021. Considering the surveyed occupant behavior during one week, the patients and their attendants spent an average of 19.4 h/d and 15.1 h/d, respectively, in the wards, whereas the nurses primarily worked in the nurse station (3.0 h/d) and wards (2.4 h/d). The doctors primarily worked in their offices (2.6 h/d) and wards (1.1 h/d). Assuming one undetected COVID-19 infector emitting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the nursing unit, we calculated the accumulated viral dose and infection probabilities of the occupants. After one week, the cumulative infection risks of the patients and attendants were almost equal (0.002), and were higher than those of the nurses (0.0013) and doctors (0.0004). Proper protection measures, such as reducing the number of attendants, increasing the air change rate, and wearing masks, were found to reduce the infection risk. It should be noted that the reported results are based on several assumptions, such as the speculated virological properties of SARS-CoV-2 and the particular trajectories of occupants. Moreover, only second generations of transmission were taken into consideration, whereas in reality, the week-long exposure may cause third generation of transmission or worse. Highlights: Weekly trajectories of 111 occupants were surveyed in a nursing unit. Quantitative microbial risk assessment with occupant behavior was utilized. Accumulated COVID-19 infection risks were assessed for all occupants. Infection risks of patients and attendants were higher than medical staff.