Progression of aortic valve insufficiency during centrifugal versus axial flow left ventricular assist device support. (15th February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Progression of aortic valve insufficiency during centrifugal versus axial flow left ventricular assist device support. (15th February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Progression of aortic valve insufficiency during centrifugal versus axial flow left ventricular assist device support
- Authors:
- Jimenez Contreras, Fabian
Mendiola Pla, Michelle
Schroder, Jacob
Bryner, Benjamin
Agarwal, Richa
Russell, Stuart D
Mirza, Jacqueline
Daneshmand, Mani A
Milano, Carmelo - Abstract:
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support can cause accelerated progression of aortic insufficiency (AI). The MOMENTUM trial has led to increased use of the HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD, due to greater hemocompatibility. However, the differential effect on the rate of progression of AI during HM3 support versus HeartMate 2 (HM2) has not been extensively studied. This analysis compares the rates of progression to moderate or severe AI (MSAI) comparing a cohort of patients supported with the HM2 versus HM3. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients implanted with HM2 or HM3 between May 2005 and June 2020. Follow-up time was limited to the first 6 years after LVAD implantation. Demographics and 4005 echocardiograms were assessed for 536 HM2 and 300 HM3 patients. The primary end point was progression to MSAI. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and landmark analyses were performed. RESULTS: Progression to MSAI was greater in the HM2 (17%) versus HM3 (9.9%) cohort. On the univariable analysis, the hazard ratio for HM3 was 0.581 (95% confidence interval 0.370–0.909, P = 0.02) whereas on multivariable analysis hazard ratio was 0.624 (95% confidence interval 0.386–1.008, P = 0.0537). Preoperative AI, female sex and body surface area <2 were significantly associated with progression to MSAI. Landmark analysis suggests that LVAD type has the most significant effect on progression to MSAIAbstract: OBJECTIVES: Long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support can cause accelerated progression of aortic insufficiency (AI). The MOMENTUM trial has led to increased use of the HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD, due to greater hemocompatibility. However, the differential effect on the rate of progression of AI during HM3 support versus HeartMate 2 (HM2) has not been extensively studied. This analysis compares the rates of progression to moderate or severe AI (MSAI) comparing a cohort of patients supported with the HM2 versus HM3. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients implanted with HM2 or HM3 between May 2005 and June 2020. Follow-up time was limited to the first 6 years after LVAD implantation. Demographics and 4005 echocardiograms were assessed for 536 HM2 and 300 HM3 patients. The primary end point was progression to MSAI. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and landmark analyses were performed. RESULTS: Progression to MSAI was greater in the HM2 (17%) versus HM3 (9.9%) cohort. On the univariable analysis, the hazard ratio for HM3 was 0.581 (95% confidence interval 0.370–0.909, P = 0.02) whereas on multivariable analysis hazard ratio was 0.624 (95% confidence interval 0.386–1.008, P = 0.0537). Preoperative AI, female sex and body surface area <2 were significantly associated with progression to MSAI. Landmark analysis suggests that LVAD type has the most significant effect on progression to MSAI between 1 and 2 years post-implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice strategies achieved low rates of progression to MSAI. Preoperative AI, female sex and body surface area <2 were the most important predictors of progression to MSAI. Pump type appears to be of secondary importance. Abstract : The use of the left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) for end-stage heart failure patients is increasing in the USA. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. Volume 61:Number 5(2022)
- Journal:
- European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 61:Number 5(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 5 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0061-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1188
- Page End:
- 1196
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02-15
- Subjects:
- Heart failure surgery -- Mechanical circulatory assistance -- Valve disease
Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Chest -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.54 - Journal URLs:
- http://ejcts.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10107940 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ejcts/ezac087 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1010-7940
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725620
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21417.xml