Effectiveness of Localized Lockdowns in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Issue 5 (13th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Yige; Undurraga, Eduardo A; Zubizarreta, José R
• Is Part Of: American journal of epidemiology. Volume 191:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 812
• Page End: 824
• Publication Date: 2022-01-13
• Subjects: causal inference -- coronavirus disease 2019 -- COVID-19 -- localized lockdowns -- lockdowns -- nonpharmaceutical interventions -- SARS-CoV-2 -- severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-9262

Abstract

Abstract: Nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as social distancing and lockdowns, have been essential to control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In particular, localized lockdowns in small geographic areas have become an important policy intervention for preventing viral spread in cases of resurgence. These localized lockdowns can result in lower social and economic costs compared with larger-scale suppression strategies. Using an integrated data set from Chile (March 3–June 15, 2020) and a novel synthetic control approach, we estimated the effect of localized lockdowns, disentangling its direct and indirect causal effects on transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Our results showed that the effects of localized lockdowns are strongly modulated by their duration and are influenced by indirect effects from neighboring geographic areas. Our estimates suggest that extending localized lockdowns can slow down SARS-CoV-2 transmission; however, localized lockdowns on their own are insufficient to control pandemic growth in the presence of indirect effects from contiguous neighboring areas that do not have lockdowns. These results provide critical empirical evidence about the effectiveness of localized lockdowns in interconnected geographic areas.