Geriatric medicine learning objectives and entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical curricula: a scoping review. (10th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: von Streng Paats, Tasslem; Masud, Tahir; Huwendiek, Sören; Blundell, Adrian; Vassallo, Michael; Stuck, Andreas E
• Is Part Of: Age and ageing. Volume 51:Number 5(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05-10
• Subjects: Geriatrics -- undergraduate medical education -- geriatric assessment -- long-term care -- biological ageing -- systematic review -- older people; Aging -- Periodicals; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac100
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-0729

Abstract

Abstract: Background: entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have become an important component of competency-based medical education. The aim of this study is to evaluate how geriatric medicine learning objectives are addressed by undergraduate medical curricula including EPAs. Methods: we performed a scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to identify undergraduate medical curricula that include EPAs. A content analysis was conducted to examine how these curricula address the care of older individuals. In addition, we mapped the curricula to 19 geriatric medicine learning objectives identified from the European curriculum of undergraduate medical education. Results: we found nine curricula, each containing between 4 and 16 core EPAs. In the sections describing the EPAs, three of the nine curricula specify that all core EPAs apply to all age groups including older patients, whereas the remaining six curricula either only refer to older patients in selected EPAs or not at all. Mapping revealed that some geriatric medicine learning objectives are covered by most curricula (e.g. medication use, multidisciplinary team work), whereas others are lacking in the majority (e.g. normal ageing, geriatric assessment, cognitive assessment, nutrition assessment, decision-making capacity assessment, long-term care). Three curricula cover most geriatric learning objectives by using a matrix aligning EPAs with geriatric competencies. Conclusions: geriatric learning objectives continue to be missing from undergraduate medical curricula, also from those adopting the novel approach of EPAs. However, this review also identified some curricula that might serve as models for how geriatric learning objectives can be successfully covered within future EPA frameworks.