Importance of considering interest in sex when evaluating satisfaction after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. (8th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kohada, Yuki; Ito, Jun; Kaiho, Yasuhiro; Kusumoto, Hiroki; Kukimoto, Takashi; Mikami, Jotaro; Hinata, Nobuyuki; Sato, Makoto
• Is Part Of: International journal of urology. Volume 29:Number 5(2022)
• Page Start: 446
• Page End: 454
• Publication Date: 2022-02-08
• Subjects: erectile dysfunction -- prostatic neoplasms -- quality of life -- robot‐assisted surgery -- urinary incontinence; Urology -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.6005
• DOI: 10.1111/iju.14813
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0919-8172

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To assess the impact of patients' interest in sex on the satisfaction after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy, longitudinal changes of urinary and sexual functions and bothers were evaluated. Methods: A total of 101 patients underwent robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy in our institution. Based on sexual interest, they were divided into the high‐interest and low‐interest groups. Overall satisfaction, urinary function, urinary bother, sexual function, and sexual bother were evaluated using the expanded prostate cancer index composite questionnaire preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. We investigated the associations between the overall satisfaction and urinary function/urinary bother/sexual function/sexual bother scores (with higher score indicating better function and less impairment). Results: In the high‐interest group ( n = 45), satisfaction correlated with high urinary function and urinary bother scores early after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (urinary function: 1 and 3 months, urinary bother: 3 months postoperatively; P < 0.05) and then with high sexual bother score thereafter (sexual bother at 6 and 12 months after surgery; P < 0.05). Sexual function score did not correlate with satisfaction. In the low‐interest group ( n = 56), satisfaction correlated with high urinary function and urinary bother scores over time (urinary function: 3 and 6 months, urinary bother: at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively; P < 0.05). Neither sexual function nor sexual bother correlated with satisfaction postoperatively in the low‐interest group. Conclusions: The impact of urinary and sexual functions and bothers on patients' overall satisfaction differed between patients with high‐ and low‐interest in sex. The patient's interest in sex should be considered when assessing satisfaction after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy.