Multi-Class Skin Problem Classification Using Deep Generative Adversarial Network (DGAN). (24th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heenaye-Mamode Khan, Maleika; Gooda Sahib-Kaudeer, Nuzhah; Dayalen, Motean; Mahomedaly, Faadil; Sinha, Ganesh R.; Nagwanshi, Kapil Kumar; Taylor, Amelia
• Other Names: Loddo Andrea Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Computational intelligence and neuroscience. Volume 2022(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03-24
• Subjects: Neurosciences -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Computational intelligence -- Periodicals; Computational neuroscience -- Periodicals; 612.80285
• DOI: 10.1155/2022/1797471
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1687-5265

Abstract

Abstract : The lack of annotated datasets makes the automatic detection of skin problems very difficult, which is also the case for most other medical applications. The outstanding results achieved by deep learning techniques in developing such applications have improved the diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless, the performance of these models is heavily dependent on the volume of labelled data used for training, which is unfortunately not available. To address this problem, traditional data augmentation is usually adopted. Recently, the emergence of a generative adversarial network (GAN) seems a more plausible solution, where synthetic images are generated. In this work, we have developed a deep generative adversarial network (DGAN) multi-class classifier, which can generate skin problem images by learning the true data distribution from the available images. Unlike the usual two-class classifier, we have developed a multi-class solution, and to address the class-imbalanced dataset, we have taken images from different datasets available online. One main challenge faced during our development is mainly to improve the stability of the DGAN model during the training phase. To analyse the performance of GAN, we have developed two CNN models in parallel based on the architecture of ResNet50 and VGG16 by augmenting the training datasets using the traditional rotation, flipping, and scaling methods. We have used both labelled and unlabelled data for testing to test the models. DGAN has outperformed the conventional data augmentation by achieving a performance of 91.1% for the unlabelled dataset and 92.3% for the labelled dataset. On the contrary, CNN models with data augmentation have achieved a performance of up to 70.8% for the unlabelled dataset. The outcome of our DGAN confirms the ability of the model to learn from unlabelled datasets and yet produce a good diagnosis result.