Mortality, complications and failure to rescue after surgery for esophageal, gastric, pancreatic and liver cancer patients based on minimum caseloads set by the German Cancer Society. Issue 4 (April 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Mortality, complications and failure to rescue after surgery for esophageal, gastric, pancreatic and liver cancer patients based on minimum caseloads set by the German Cancer Society. Issue 4 (April 2022)
- Main Title:
- Mortality, complications and failure to rescue after surgery for esophageal, gastric, pancreatic and liver cancer patients based on minimum caseloads set by the German Cancer Society
- Authors:
- Uttinger, Konstantin L.
Diers, Johannes
Baum, Philip
Pietryga, Sebastian
Baumann, Nikolas
Hankir, Mohamed
Germer, Christoph-Thomas
Wiegering, Armin - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The German Cancer Society (DKG) board certifies hospitals in treating esophageal, gastric, liver and pancreatic cancer among others. There has been no systematic verification of the number of major surgical resections set by DKG certification with regards to in-house mortality and failure to rescue (FtR). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of anonymized nationwide hospital billing data (DRG data, 2009–2017). Inclusion criteria were based on the annual surgical minimum caseload (SMC) in accordance with DKG certification. Results: 171, 429 datasets were identified, including 31, 140 esophageal, 54, 155 gastric, 57, 343 pancreatic and 28, 791 liver resections. In-house mortality ranged from 6.2% for gastric resections to 8.1% for pancreatic resections. Differences in in-house mortality between hospitals which fulfilled SMC on average and those which did not fulfill SMC on average were 40.8% (5.3% vs 8.2%) for esophageal, 32.3% (4.8% vs 6.8%) for gastric and 45.7% (6.1% vs 9.8%) for pancreatic resections, while it was 8.2% higher in SMC-hospitals (7.6% vs 7.0%) for liver resections. Complication occurrence rates for esophageal, gastric and pancreatic resections were similar in SMC- and non-SMC-hospitals while FtR in hospitals fulfilling SMC was significantly lower. Data for liver resections demonstrated the same trends only in a sub-analysis of complex procedures. Conclusion: This study demonstrates an association between caseload threshold definedAbstract: Background: The German Cancer Society (DKG) board certifies hospitals in treating esophageal, gastric, liver and pancreatic cancer among others. There has been no systematic verification of the number of major surgical resections set by DKG certification with regards to in-house mortality and failure to rescue (FtR). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of anonymized nationwide hospital billing data (DRG data, 2009–2017). Inclusion criteria were based on the annual surgical minimum caseload (SMC) in accordance with DKG certification. Results: 171, 429 datasets were identified, including 31, 140 esophageal, 54, 155 gastric, 57, 343 pancreatic and 28, 791 liver resections. In-house mortality ranged from 6.2% for gastric resections to 8.1% for pancreatic resections. Differences in in-house mortality between hospitals which fulfilled SMC on average and those which did not fulfill SMC on average were 40.8% (5.3% vs 8.2%) for esophageal, 32.3% (4.8% vs 6.8%) for gastric and 45.7% (6.1% vs 9.8%) for pancreatic resections, while it was 8.2% higher in SMC-hospitals (7.6% vs 7.0%) for liver resections. Complication occurrence rates for esophageal, gastric and pancreatic resections were similar in SMC- and non-SMC-hospitals while FtR in hospitals fulfilling SMC was significantly lower. Data for liver resections demonstrated the same trends only in a sub-analysis of complex procedures. Conclusion: This study demonstrates an association between caseload threshold defined by DKG and lower mortality in esophageal, gastric, pancreatic and complex liver surgery. In these resections, FtR was reduced if SMC was fulfilled. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 48:Issue 4(2022)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 48:Issue 4(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 48, Issue 4 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0048-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 924
- Page End:
- 932
- Publication Date:
- 2022-04
- Subjects:
- Minimum caseloads -- In-house/hospital mortality -- Failure to rescue -- German cancer society -- Complications
Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21322.xml