A comparison of surgical site infections following total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgeries identified by Infection Prevention and Control and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Alberta, Canada. (24th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ellison, Jennifer J. R.; Boychuk, Lesia R.; Chakravorty, David; Chandran, A. Uma; Conly, John M.; Howatt, Andrea; Kim, Joseph; Litvinchuk, Stacey; Pokhrel, Arun; Shen, Ye; Smith, Christopher; Bush, Kathryn
• Is Part Of: Infection control and hospital epidemiology. Volume 43:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 435
• Page End: 441
• Publication Date: 2022-04-24
• Subjects: Nosocomial infections -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Health facilities -- Sanitation -- Periodicals; Hospital buildings -- Sanitation -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Hospitals -- Periodicals; Infection Control -- Periodicals; 614.44
• DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.159
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0899-823X

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To understand how the different data collections methods of the Alberta Health Services Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPC) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) are affecting reported rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) following total hip replacements (THRs) and total knee replacements (TKRs). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Four hospitals in Alberta, Canada. Patients: Those with THR or TKR surgeries between September 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018. Methods: Demographic information, complex SSIs reported by IPC and NSQIP were compared and then IPC and NSQIP data were matched with percent agreement and Cohen's κ calculated. Statistical analysis was performed for age, gender and complex SSIs. A P value <.05 was considered significant. Results: In total, 7, 549 IPC and 2, 037 NSQIP patients were compared. The complex SSI rate for NSQIP was higher compared to IPC (THR: 1.19 vs 0.68 [ P = .147]; TKR: 0.92 vs 0.80 [ P = .682]). After matching, 7 SSIs were identified by both IPC and NSQIP; 3 were identified only by IPC, and 12 were identified only by NSQIP (positive agreement, 0.48; negative agreement, 1.0; κ = 0.48). Conclusions: Different approaches to monitor SSIs may lead to different results and trending patterns. NSQIP reports total SSI rates that are consistently higher than IPC. If systems are compared at any point in time, confidence on the data may be eroded. Stakeholders need to be aware of these variations and education provided to facilitate an understanding of differences and a consistent approach to SSI surveillance monitoring over time.