Effect of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Treatment on Pulmonary Function in Pediatric Patients. (4th October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Treatment on Pulmonary Function in Pediatric Patients. (4th October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Effect of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Treatment on Pulmonary Function in Pediatric Patients
- Authors:
- Cowley, Maren
Nicho, Ana
Hand, Elizabeth - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Stenotrophomonas maltophili a, a bacteria with broad, inherent antimicrobial resistance, commonly colonizes the respiratory tract of mechanically ventilated patients. Studies in adults have failed to show a difference in outcomes for patients treated or untreated for S. maltophilia respiratory cultures. Outcomes data in children, however, are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine whether S. maltophilia treatment improves the pulmonary function of pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with S. maltophilia respiratory cultures between August 1, 2006 and August 1, 2016 was conducted. The primary objective was to compare pulmonary function improvement between patients treated and untreated for S. maltophilia . Results: Seventy-two patients were identified, 27 treated (T) and 45 not treated (NT). Baseline characteristics were similar except more untreated patients were in the NICU ( P = 0.036) and premature ( P = 0.021). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88.9%) and minocycline(11.1%) were the most commonly used antibiotics for S. maltophilia. Most patients had polymicrobial cultures and were treated with concomitant antimicrobials (T 85.2%; NT 84.4%; P = 0.933). There was no statistical difference in pulmonary function improvement represented by ventilation parameters (T 77.8%; NT 75.6%; P = 0.830), radiographic findings (T 27.3%; NT 24.3%; P = 0.801), physical exam (T 30.4%; NT 27.0%; P = 0.776), maximumAbstract: Background: Stenotrophomonas maltophili a, a bacteria with broad, inherent antimicrobial resistance, commonly colonizes the respiratory tract of mechanically ventilated patients. Studies in adults have failed to show a difference in outcomes for patients treated or untreated for S. maltophilia respiratory cultures. Outcomes data in children, however, are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine whether S. maltophilia treatment improves the pulmonary function of pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with S. maltophilia respiratory cultures between August 1, 2006 and August 1, 2016 was conducted. The primary objective was to compare pulmonary function improvement between patients treated and untreated for S. maltophilia . Results: Seventy-two patients were identified, 27 treated (T) and 45 not treated (NT). Baseline characteristics were similar except more untreated patients were in the NICU ( P = 0.036) and premature ( P = 0.021). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88.9%) and minocycline(11.1%) were the most commonly used antibiotics for S. maltophilia. Most patients had polymicrobial cultures and were treated with concomitant antimicrobials (T 85.2%; NT 84.4%; P = 0.933). There was no statistical difference in pulmonary function improvement represented by ventilation parameters (T 77.8%; NT 75.6%; P = 0.830), radiographic findings (T 27.3%; NT 24.3%; P = 0.801), physical exam (T 30.4%; NT 27.0%; P = 0.776), maximum temperature (T 25.9%; NT 20.9%; P = 0.628), or white blood cell count (T 60.0%; NT 44.7%; P = 0.236). Hyperkalemia led to the discontinuation of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in one patient. Overall, four patients died during hospitalization (T 11.1%; NT 2.2%; P = 0.111). Conclusion: No statistical difference in improvement of pulmonary function in patients treated or not treated for a positive S. maltophilia respiratory culture was identified. Treatment directed at S. maltophilia in polymicrobial respiratory infection may not improve outcomes. Further research is needed to determine when treatment of S. maltophilia in pediatric patients results in improved outcomes. Disclosures: All authors: No reported disclosures. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 4(2017)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Open forum infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 4(2017)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0004-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S586
- Page End:
- S586
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10-04
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1535 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2328-8957
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21325.xml