The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator. Issue 4 (17th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: He, Mingzhu; Ding, Qian; Li, Linlin; Yang, Guangju; Zhao, Yijiao; Sun, Yuchun; Zhang, Lei
• Is Part Of: Journal of prosthodontics. Volume 31:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 326
• Page End: 332
• Publication Date: 2021-07-17
• Subjects: Accuracy -- occlusion -- transfer plate -- virtual articulator -- maximal intercuspal position; Prosthodontics -- Periodicals; Dental implants -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; 617.69
• DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13405
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1059-941X

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of transferring casts in maximal intercuspal position to a virtual articulator by using transfer plates in the laboratory scanner before and after occlusal optimization. Material and methods: Five sets of standard dental casts were mounted on a mechanical articulator in maximal intercuspal position. The number and position of occlusal contacts were determined with 12‐μm articulating foil. After a calibration process according to the manufacturer's instructions, the mountings were transferred to a virtual articulator using the transfer plates in a laboratory scanner. The occlusion of the digital casts was determined before and after the occlusal optimization process. Then, the sensitivity and positive predictive value were determined by comparing the occlusal contact points in the virtual articulator with those in the mechanical articulator. To evaluate trueness, the occlusal surface of the maxillary teeth in the mechanical articulator was recorded by polyvinyl siloxane occlusal record in maximal intercuspal position and retained on the mandibular arch. The trueness was calculated as the deviation between the occlusal surface of the maxillary teeth in the mechanical articulator and the virtual articulator. To evaluate precision, one set of the casts was scanned 10 times. And the deviation of the interarch position of the maxillary arches when superimposing the mandibular arches of every 2 different scans was calculated. Results: The sensitivity before occlusal optimization (0.14 ± 0.15) was significantly lower than that after occlusal optimization (0.82 ± 0.10) ( p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between the positive predictive value before (0.80 ± 0.45) and after (0.81 ± 0.09) occlusal optimization ( p = 0.952). The trueness before (91.0 ± 10.7 µm) and after (75.4 ± 25.2 µm) occlusal optimization had no significant difference ( p = 0.249). The precision before occlusal optimization (11.6 ± 3.8 µm) was significantly superior to that after occlusal optimization (75.6 ± 39.2 µm ) ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The accuracy of transferring casts in maximal intercuspal position to a virtual articulator using transfer plates in the laboratory scanner could be improved after occlusal optimization and can meet the clinical needs for occlusal design and analysis of prostheses.