Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study. (4th October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study. (4th October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Assesing Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Treatment in Hospitalized Patients; A Point Prevalence Study
- Authors:
- Reisfeld, Sharon
Assali, Mahdi
Tannous, Elias
Amarny, Kamal
Stein, Michal - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Between 20 and 50% of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients is considered inappropriate. Inappropriate antibiotic therapy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ratio of appropriate antibiotic therapy among adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with at least one systemic antibiotic therapy, and to compare different methods for evaluation of appropriateness. Methods: This was a point-prevalence study, in which all adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with systemic antibiotic therapy (orally or intravenous) were included. Appropriateness was evaluated by experts (infectious diseases specialist and a clinical pharmacist specializing in antibiotic therapy), and by ranking 11 quality indicators based on literature recommendations. Agreement between all methods was analyzed. Results: 106 patients were included in the study; most of them were treated empirically (78%). Almost half of the patients were treated for urogenital and abdominal infections (44%). Appropriateness ranged from 20-75%, depending on method of evaluation. We found a very low agreement between the more strict definition and experts' opinion (kappa=0.068), and a medium agreement between the less strict definition and experts' opinion (kappa=0.45). Respiratory tract infections were treated inappropriately most of the time, according to all evaluation methods. Appropriate blood culturesAbstract: Background: Between 20 and 50% of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients is considered inappropriate. Inappropriate antibiotic therapy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ratio of appropriate antibiotic therapy among adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with at least one systemic antibiotic therapy, and to compare different methods for evaluation of appropriateness. Methods: This was a point-prevalence study, in which all adult patients admitted to a secondary hospital and treated with systemic antibiotic therapy (orally or intravenous) were included. Appropriateness was evaluated by experts (infectious diseases specialist and a clinical pharmacist specializing in antibiotic therapy), and by ranking 11 quality indicators based on literature recommendations. Agreement between all methods was analyzed. Results: 106 patients were included in the study; most of them were treated empirically (78%). Almost half of the patients were treated for urogenital and abdominal infections (44%). Appropriateness ranged from 20-75%, depending on method of evaluation. We found a very low agreement between the more strict definition and experts' opinion (kappa=0.068), and a medium agreement between the less strict definition and experts' opinion (kappa=0.45). Respiratory tract infections were treated inappropriately most of the time, according to all evaluation methods. Appropriate blood cultures were taken before starting antibiotic therapy only in 22% of the cases. Conclusion: We found a high rate of inappropriate antibiotic therapy in different indications for therapy, both by objective definitions, and by experts' opinions (although to a lesser amount in the latter). We need to use strict and uniform parameters in order to optimize antibiotic therapy in the hospital. Immediate interventions must be made regarding appropriate blood cultures' collection, and to improve empiric treatment for respiratory tract infections. Disclosures: All authors: No reported disclosures. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 4(2017)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Open forum infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 4(2017)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0004-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S509
- Page End:
- S509
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10-04
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1320 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2328-8957
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21300.xml