Optimal distributions of central-place foragers: honey bee foraging in a mass flowering crop. (4th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Robinson, Samuel V J; Hoover, Shelley E; Pernal, Stephen F; Cartar, Ralph V
• Editors: Snell-Rood, Emilie
• Is Part Of: Behavioral ecology. Volume 33:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 386
• Page End: 397
• Publication Date: 2022-02-04
• Subjects: agriculture -- energetic -- ideal-free -- landscape ecology -- mass-flowering crop -- nectar -- oilseed rape -- pollination -- sociality -- spatial competition; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Behavior evolution -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab143
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-2249

Abstract

Abstract: The ideal-free distribution and central-place foraging are important ecological models that can explain the distribution of foraging organisms in their environment. However, this model ignores distance-based foraging costs from a central place (hive, nest), whereas central-place foraging ignores competition. Different foraging currencies and cooperation between foragers also create different optimal distributions of foragers, but are limited to a simple two-patch model. We present a hybrid model of the ideal-free distribution that uses realistic competitive effects although accounting for distance-based foraging, and test it using honey bees ( Apis mellifera L.) foraging in canola fields ( Brassica napus L.). Our simulations show that foragers maximizing efficiency ( e n e r g y p r o f i t s ÷ l o s s e s ) prioritize distance to their aggregation more than those maximizing net-rate ( e n e r g y p r o f i t s ÷ t i m e ), and that social foragers move to more distant patches to maximize group benefits, meaning that social foragers do not approach an ideal-free distribution. Simulated efficiency-maximizers had a hump-shaped relationship of trip times with distance, spending shorter amounts of time in both nearby and far-away patches. Canola fields were far more attractive to simulated foragers than semi-natural areas, suggesting limited foraging on semi-natural lands during the bloom period of canola. Finally, we found that the observed distribution of honey bees in canola fields most closely resembled the optimal distribution of solitary efficiency-maximizers. Our model has both theoretical and practical uses, as it allows us to model central-place forager distributions in complex landscapes as well as providing information on appropriate hive stocking rates for agricultural pollination. Abstract : The ideal-free distribution and central-place foraging models both make predictions about how foragers should use their environment. However, both models are incomplete, as they either ignore travel distance or competitive effects. We designed a realistic hybrid model and tested it using honey bees foraging in canola crops. Honey bees followed predictions of efficiency-maximizers, and interestingly, appear to maximize solitary rather than group efficiency.