Risk Factors for Myopia in 2 Hong Kong School Systems: A Pilot Study. Issue 1 (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liang, Yuanyuan; Kee, Chea-Su
• Is Part Of: Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology. Volume 11:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: astigmatism -- myopia -- school system; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; Eye -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 617.7005
• DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000486
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0129-1653

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Myopia has reached "epidemic" proportions, especially in several East Asian countries. Most myopia emerges during childhood, particularly during the school years. The aim of this study was to investigate myopia prevalence and compare risk factors of myopia among Hong Kong Chinese primary school children under 2 different educational systems. Design: Cross-sectional study Methods: Visual assessments were conducted in 1 government-funded primary school (n = 159) and 1 international school (n = 223) in Hong Kong in September and October 2018, respectively. Measurements were performed on children aged 8 to 10 years old. Noncycloplegic refraction and axial length were measured, respectively. A validated questionnaire focusing on demographic information, nonscreen time (eg, reading and writing on paper materials), screen time (ie, smartphones and tablets usage), time spent on outdoor activities, and other myopia risk factors was completed by parents of participants. Results: The prevalence of myopia [37.5% vs 12.8%, P < 0.001; spherical equivalent refraction (SER) ⩽ –1.00 diopter (D)] and refractive astigmatism [25.0% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001; cylinder (Cyl) ≥ 1.00 diopter cylinder (DC)] were significantly higher in the local school than in the international school. Students in the local school were slightly older than those attending the international school (9.17 ± 0.82 years vs 8.95 ± 0.85 years, P = 0.046), and there was no significant difference in gender distribution between the 2 schools ( P = 0.51). There were significant differences in the demographic information including parental myopia ( P < 0.001), family income ( P < 0.001), and parents' educational level ( P < 0.001) between the 2 schools. Multiple regression analysis showed that parental myopia history and continuous near work was associated with myopia in the local school, while the father's educational level was related to myopia in the international school. Conclusions: In this pilot study, despite the much higher prevalence of parental myopia and high myopia in the international school, the myopia prevalence among the students is lower in this school than in the local school, suggesting that environmental factors other than genetics might have a stronger protective effect in this school population. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text