Impact and contact problems of explosives by 'Mixed' meshless local Petrov-Galerkin finite volume method. (June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Tao; Liao, Maoxiong; Pan, Shuyi
• Is Part Of: Engineering analysis with boundary elements. Volume 139(2022)
• Page Start: 56
• Page End: 68
• Publication Date: 2022-06
• Subjects: Meshless method -- MLPG -- Explosive -- Impact -- Mixed Method; Boundary element methods -- Periodicals; Engineering mathematics -- Periodicals; Équations intégrales de frontière, Méthodes des -- Périodiques; Mathématiques de l'ingénieur -- Périodiques; Boundary element methods; Engineering mathematics; Periodicals; 620.00151
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.03.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0955-7997

Abstract

Abstract: The 'Mixed' Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin Finite Volume method (MLPG5) is developed for solving low-velocity impact problems of plastic bonded explosives (PBX). Due to the ductility and plasticity of PBX, there is large deformation instead of pulverization or fragmentation. In this paper, the impact dynamics equations are solved by the meshless approach (MLPG5), both stress as well as displacements are interpolated, through the moving least squares (MLS) interpolation schemes, which eliminates the expensive process of domain integrals and differentiating the shape function. The collocation method is applied to enforce strain-displacement relationships only at each nodal point, instead of the subdomain. In the present mixed method, the independent interpolation of stress improves accuracies of both the plastic stress and contact stress. The contact force is obtained by penalty function method via iteration scheme. Due to the non-linear constitutive relation, the incremental stress is obtained via radial return schemes through Newton Raphson iteration. Finally, several numerical examples are given to demonstrate the feasibility and the accuracy of the present numerical approach compared with the finite element method. Numerical examples also demonstrate the advantages of the present methods: (i) smaller support sizes can be used; (ii) higher accuracies of stress are obtained.