Evaluating individual heating alternatives in integrated energy system by employing energy and exergy analysis. (15th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tahir, Muhammad Faizan; Haoyong, Chen; Guangze, Han
• Is Part Of: Energy. Volume 249(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-06-15
• Subjects: Energy analysis -- Exergy analysis -- Integrated energy system -- Individual heating infrastructure -- Heat pumps -- Micro CHP; Power resources -- Periodicals; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123753
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-5442

Abstract

Abstract: With the aim to meet customers diverse energy needs by an economical and ecological means, integrated energy system has become a popular choice. Amongst various integrated energy system coupling configurations, individual heating infrastructure entails painstaking attention due to rapid expansion. Individual heating network plays a massive role in carbonizing the atmosphere as traditionally individual heating demands are fulfilled by fossil fuel-fired (natural gas and coal) boilers. Recently, trend is heading towards the integration of energy efficient technologies like micro combined heat and power and heat pumps to replace fossil fuel boilers. However, individual heating performance evaluation is generally investigated by energy analysis that employs only the first law of thermodynamics, thereby exergy analysis assessment and its comparison with energy analysis become noteworthy to measure actual performance. In this work, energy and exergy analysis of the individual heating network of China for the year 2030 is performed under the framework of both laws of thermodynamics. The proposed work includes various technological options like Hydrogen fired micro combined heat and power, natural gas fired micro combined heat and power and heat pumps to replace the fossil fuel boilers intending to attain an economically viable and carbon-free environment. At first, energy and exergy efficiencies of the aforementioned heat producing components are computed and afterwards EnergyPLAN technical simulation strategy is employed to evaluate performance in terms of costs, CO2 emissions and primary energy supply. Subsequently, a comparison of both analysis is provided in order to present the difference between the two analysis which substantiates that exergy analysis provides inferior results than energy analysis as depicted in case 3 where heat pumps inclusion appears to be the most decarbonized alternative for energy analysis but corroborates vice versa for exergy analysis. However, exergy analysis complements the energy analysis that helps evaluating the actual performance of system in relation to climate change mitigation and cost-effectiveness. Highlights: Energy and exergy analysis of individual heating network of China is performed. Economical and decarbonized environment is proposed. Exergy analysis results are inferior to energy analysis. Heat Pump is considered worse alternative according to exergy analysis.