Comparative Life-Cycle assessment of microalgal biomass production in conventional growth media versus newly developed nanoemulsion media. (May 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative Life-Cycle assessment of microalgal biomass production in conventional growth media versus newly developed nanoemulsion media. (May 2022)
- Main Title:
- Comparative Life-Cycle assessment of microalgal biomass production in conventional growth media versus newly developed nanoemulsion media
- Authors:
- Nigam, Harshita
Jain, Rahul
Malik, Anushree
Singh, Vikram - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Highlights: Both midpoint and endpoint analysis were performed using ReCiPe 2016 method. Two times less CO2 eq. release with nanoemeulsion compared to conventional media. Bioreactor material and electricity usage were major contributors in algal cultivation. Process challenges were identified and improvement measures suggested. Abstract: Microalgae biomass is a potential feedstock for biodiesel, animal feed, biofertilizer, and other products such as bioactive compounds. Most of the reported studies describe microalgae as a green process, however, the impacts associated with its growth media and cultivation have seldom been studied. With an aim to analyze the environmental impacts, the present study compares the life-cycle assessment of microalgal cultivation in two growth media. The data used was obtained from the experimental sets where microalgae C. pyrenoidosa was cultivated in BG11 (control or SC-1) and silicone oil nanoemulsion (previously developed medium or SC-2) on a lab scale. The environmental impacts were evaluated using the ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint method using Sima Pro 9.0 software based on a "cradle-to-gate" approach. The total environmental score for 1 kg microalgal biomass production was 99.25Pt in SC-1, and 53.39Pt in SC-2, concluding greater environmental burden by SC-1. The photobioreactor construction material along with the operation led to maximum emissions, human toxicity, and resource depletion. In summary, the newlyGraphical abstract: Highlights: Both midpoint and endpoint analysis were performed using ReCiPe 2016 method. Two times less CO2 eq. release with nanoemeulsion compared to conventional media. Bioreactor material and electricity usage were major contributors in algal cultivation. Process challenges were identified and improvement measures suggested. Abstract: Microalgae biomass is a potential feedstock for biodiesel, animal feed, biofertilizer, and other products such as bioactive compounds. Most of the reported studies describe microalgae as a green process, however, the impacts associated with its growth media and cultivation have seldom been studied. With an aim to analyze the environmental impacts, the present study compares the life-cycle assessment of microalgal cultivation in two growth media. The data used was obtained from the experimental sets where microalgae C. pyrenoidosa was cultivated in BG11 (control or SC-1) and silicone oil nanoemulsion (previously developed medium or SC-2) on a lab scale. The environmental impacts were evaluated using the ReCiPe midpoint and endpoint method using Sima Pro 9.0 software based on a "cradle-to-gate" approach. The total environmental score for 1 kg microalgal biomass production was 99.25Pt in SC-1, and 53.39Pt in SC-2, concluding greater environmental burden by SC-1. The photobioreactor construction material along with the operation led to maximum emissions, human toxicity, and resource depletion. In summary, the newly developed nanoemulsion medium was found to be eco-friendly that has the potential to minimize the usage of conventional nutrients and resources. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Bioresource technology. Volume 352(2022)
- Journal:
- Bioresource technology
- Issue:
- Volume 352(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 352, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 352
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0352-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-05
- Subjects:
- LCA -- Microalgae -- Environmental impacts -- Nanoemulsion
Biomass -- Periodicals
Biomass energy -- Periodicals
Bioremediation -- Periodicals
Agricultural wastes -- Periodicals
Factory and trade waste -- Periodicals
Organic wastes -- Periodicals
Bioénergie -- Périodiques
Déchets agricoles -- Périodiques
Déchets industriels -- Périodiques
Déchets organiques -- Périodiques
Déchets (Combustible) -- Périodiques
662.88 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09608524 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127069 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-8524
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2089.495000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21286.xml