Closure of cleft lips with Pfeifer's wave line technique does not inhibit upper lip growth: A retrospective study. Issue 3 (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Scheller, Konstanze; Schubert, Johannes
• Is Part Of: Journal of cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Volume 50:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 254
• Page End: 261
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: CLP -- Lip length development -- Pfeifer wave-line procedure -- Longitudinal study; Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- surgery -- Periodicals; Skull -- surgery -- Periodicals; Oral Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Surgery, Oral -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.514
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1010-5182

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study is to describe the growth of the upper lip after reconstruction with a Pfeifer wave-line incision in patients with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (CL/P) in the long term. This was a longitudinal, monocentric, retrospective study. Metric standardized lip length measurements were taken annually from the age of 6 months to the age of 16 years. Defined anatomical points were determined which describe the lip length from the nasal entrance to the highest point of the Cupid's bow. The lip length of the unaffected side in unilateral cleft patients was taken as control. A total of 234 patients with cleft lip with/without cleft palate (CL/P) were included in the study. At the time of the primary surgery, the medial sides in unilateral clefts were 2–4 mm and the lateral sides 1.5–2 mm shorter than the normal unaffected side (p≤0.001). Two main periods of growth, one during childhood (first to sixth years) and one during adolescence (12th–16th years) were seen. At the age of 16 years, the end of the observation period, the lip length in unilateral clefts resulted in a clinically not noticeable shortening of the cleft side (0.37±0.26 mm). There was no correlation between lip length development and primary cleft width at the time of primary cleft lip surgery at 6 months. The upper lip in patients with bilateral clefts developed symmetrically without any obvious asymmetry. Both sides showed a lip length difference of 0.1±0.05 mm at the age of 16 years (p=0.1). Compared to the upper lip length of the control group, bilateral clefts showed a slight tendency toward a longer upper lip (p=0.52). Within the limitations of the study it seems that when lip length development is a priority in cleft lip surgery, Pfeifer wave-line procedure is good option to achieve symmetric results in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip surgery and, therefore, is a relevant option among a variety of other techniques.