Assessing the presence and spread of Renibacterium salmoninarum between farmed and wild fish in Sweden. Issue 5 (29th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Persson, David B.; Aspán, Anna; Hysing, Paulina; Blomkvist, Eva; Jansson, Eva; Orsén, Ludvig; Hällbom, Hampus; Axén, Charlotte
• Is Part Of: Journal of fish diseases. Volume 45:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 613
• Page End: 621
• Publication Date: 2022-01-29
• Subjects: BKD -- Renibacterium salmoninarum -- Salmonids -- wild fish; Fishes -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 639.3
• DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13586
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-7775

Abstract

Abstract: Bacterial kidney disease (BKD) can be a devastating bacterial infection in salmonids, and it is present in aquaculture throughout the world. BKD is caused by the Gram‐positive facultative intracellular bacterium Renibacterium salmoninarum ( R . salmoninarum ) that is spread both horizontally and vertically. Disease signs include external ulcerations and blisters and internal signs such as organ swelling, granulomas, petechiae and ascites. In Sweden, BKD accounts for a significant income loss in aquacultures due to expensive decontamination of the facility and increased disease susceptibility for the immunocompromised fish leading to higher mortality rates. In addition, uncontrolled spread in aquaculture may threaten the survival of wild fish populations. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of R . salmoninarum in wild salmonids caught in Swedish waters where net pen farms with a recent history of BKD are present. Four rivers with at least one BKD‐positive or recently BKD‐positive farm were selected. In addition, we evaluated the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for surveillance and monitoring of ongoing infections at these locations. In total, 1058 fish were sampled from four different river systems, and of them 52 (4.9%) were positive for R . salmoninarum by antigen ELISA. Surprisingly, these fish were not evenly distributed between the four river systems, but 50 were caught in the same river (Ljungan). This accounts for an alarmingly high rate of 17% R . salmoninarum ‐positive samples in wild salmonids in this area. This number is far above what was expected and clearly shows the risk with an open farming system as well as the importance of effective health monitoring programmes to avoid an uncontrolled spread of the disease. The use of eDNA for monitoring BKD is somewhat difficult to evaluate. Few of the water samples analysed were PCR positive for R . salmoninarum (2 of 38) and those were collected where no ELISA positive fish were identified. In addition to water, sediment samples were collected under a net pen farm that had recently slaughtered all fish due to ongoing R . salmoninarum infections. Sediment samples are more promising than water as 4 of 5 samples at one farming facility where positive for R . salmoninarum . Thus, sediment samples may be valuable for monitoring potential ongoing BKD in farms, without the need to sacrifice valuable fish.