Group-led creative writing and behavioural health in cancer: a randomised clinical trial. Issue 1 (9th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nesterova, Darya; Zhu, Junjia; Kramer, Courtney; Vasekar, Monali; Truica, Cristina; Joshi, Aditya; Hayes, Michael; Kessler, Jolene; Saunders, Erika F H; Drabick, Joseph J; Joshi, Monika
• Is Part Of: BMJ supportive & palliative care. Volume 12:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 91
• Page End: 98
• Publication Date: 2021-01-09
• Subjects: complementary therapy -- cancer -- psychological care; Palliative treatment -- Periodicals; Terminal care -- Periodicals; 616.029
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002463
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-435X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Cancer diagnosis can adversely affect mental well-being and overall clinical outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of a group-led creative writing workshop (CWW) on mood in patients with cancer prospectively. Methods: We conducted a single-institution phase II study. Sixty adult patients with cancer (any type or stage) were randomised 2:1 to CWW (4×CWW sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks) versus active control (AC) (independent writing at home with the help of a book, four sessions, bimonthly over 8 weeks). The total study duration was 6 months with a follow-up of up to 3 months. Primary objective: changes in overall mood, depression and anxiety symptoms before and after intervention in both arms. Emotional Thermometer Scale (ETS) was used to assess changes in patients' mood. Additionally, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD)-7 were used to evaluate depression and anxiety symptoms. Results: Of 50 evaluable patients (CWW 34, AC 17), 26 patients in the CWW arm attended at least one class and 19 attended at least four classes. Patients in CWW had significant immediate improvement in the overall ETS (post vs preclass scores; p<0.0001, 95% CI −4.31 to −2.47). Four of the five subscale ETS scores were significantly lower for the CWW arm: distress (p=0.0346, 95% CI −2.6 to −0.1), anxiety (p=0.0366, 95% CI −4.1 to −0.2), depression (p=0.0441, 95% CI −3.9 to −0.1) and anger (p=0.0494, 95% CI −3.3 to 0). No significant differences were seen in the AC arm. No significant differences were observed in the PHQ-9 or the GAD-7 scores. Conclusion: CWW had a positive effect on mood based on ETS scores, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit among patients with cancer.