Comparative effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments in acute minor ischaemic stroke. Issue 1 (20th July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments in acute minor ischaemic stroke. Issue 1 (20th July 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comparative effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments in acute minor ischaemic stroke
- Authors:
- Kim, Shina
Kim, Joon-Tae
Lee, Ji Sung
Kim, Beom Joon
Park, Jong-Moo
Kang, Kyusik
Lee, Soo Joo
Kim, Jae Guk
Cha, Jae-Kwan
Kim, Dae-Hyun
Park, Tai Hwan
Park, Sang-Soon
Lee, Kyung Bok
Lee, Jun
Hong, Keun-Sik
Cho, Yong-Jin
Park, Hong-Kyun
Lee, Byung-Chul
Yu, Kyung-Ho
Oh, Mi Sun
Kim, Dong-Eog
Ryu, Wi-Sun
Choi, Jay Chol
Kwon, Jee-Hyun
Kim, Wook-Joo
Shin, Dong-Ick
Sohn, Sung-Il
Hong, Jeong-Ho
Park, Man-Seok
Choi, Kang-Ho
Cho, Ki-Hyun
Lee, Juneyoung
Bae, Hee-Joon
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: No study has thoroughly compared the effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments (other than clopidogrel–aspirin) versus clopidogrel–aspirin or aspirin alone for early secondary prevention in acute ischaemic stroke. Methods: We identified patients with acute, minor, non-cardiogenic ischaemic stroke treated with aspirin alone, clopidogrel–aspirin or other combination treatment. Propensity scores considering the inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust for baseline imbalances. The primary outcome was the composite of all strokes (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality at 3 months. Results: Among 12 234 patients (male: 61.9%; age: 65.5±13 years) who met the eligibility criteria, aspirin, clopidogrel–aspirin and other combination treatments were administered in 52.2%, 42.9% and 4.9% of patients, respectively. In the crude analysis, the primary outcome event at 3 months occurred in 14.5% of the other combination group, 14.4% of the aspirin group and 13.0% of the clopidogrel–aspirin group. In the weighted Cox proportional hazards analysis, the 3-month primary outcome event occurred less frequently in the clopidogrel–aspirin group than in the other combination group (weighted HR: 0.82 (0.59–1.13)), while no association was found between the aspirin group (weighted HR: 1.04 (0.76–1.44)) or other combination group and the 3-month primary outcome. Conclusion: Other combined antiplatelet treatment,Abstract : Background: No study has thoroughly compared the effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments (other than clopidogrel–aspirin) versus clopidogrel–aspirin or aspirin alone for early secondary prevention in acute ischaemic stroke. Methods: We identified patients with acute, minor, non-cardiogenic ischaemic stroke treated with aspirin alone, clopidogrel–aspirin or other combination treatment. Propensity scores considering the inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust for baseline imbalances. The primary outcome was the composite of all strokes (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality at 3 months. Results: Among 12 234 patients (male: 61.9%; age: 65.5±13 years) who met the eligibility criteria, aspirin, clopidogrel–aspirin and other combination treatments were administered in 52.2%, 42.9% and 4.9% of patients, respectively. In the crude analysis, the primary outcome event at 3 months occurred in 14.5% of the other combination group, 14.4% of the aspirin group and 13.0% of the clopidogrel–aspirin group. In the weighted Cox proportional hazards analysis, the 3-month primary outcome event occurred less frequently in the clopidogrel–aspirin group than in the other combination group (weighted HR: 0.82 (0.59–1.13)), while no association was found between the aspirin group (weighted HR: 1.04 (0.76–1.44)) or other combination group and the 3-month primary outcome. Conclusion: Other combined antiplatelet treatment, compared with aspirin alone or clopidogrel–aspirin, was not associated with reduced risks of primary composite vascular events or recurrent stroke during the first 3 months after stroke. Therefore, the results suggest that other combination treatments, particularly the cilostazol-based combination, may not be effective alternatives for clopidogrel–aspirin to prevent early vascular events in patients with acute minor stroke. Further exploration in clinical trials will be needed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Stroke and vascular neurology. Volume 7:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Stroke and vascular neurology
- Issue:
- Volume 7:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 7, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0007-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 13
- Page End:
- 21
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07-20
- Subjects:
- stroke
Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals
Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.81005 - Journal URLs:
- http://svn.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/svn-2020-000841 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2059-8688
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21239.xml