144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020. (4th December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020. (4th December 2021)
- Main Title:
- 144. Antifungal Use Trends in Hospitalized Adults in the United States, 2016-2020
- Authors:
- Kaip, Emily A
Shippey, Ernie
MacDougall, Conan - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Surveillance of antimicrobial use is a cornerstone of antimicrobial stewardship, though antifungal (AF) use is less frequently characterized. AFs are a major driver of inpatient costs and their use both reflects and drives changes in fungal susceptibility patterns. We report on trends in AF use in a large sample of United States hospitals over time including predictors of AF use. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult inpatient visits between 2016 and 2020 at hospitals contributing data to the Vizient Clinical Database/Clinical Resource Manager (www.vizientinc.com ). Inpatient use of systemically administered AFs was investigated as a function of study quarter, diagnosis code, and underlying immunosuppressive condition. Changes in AF use were modeled using logistic and negative binomial regression. Results: We examined over 23 million admissions across 470 hospitals, 43% of which were classified as teaching hospitals and 54% of which performed solid organ transplants. During the study period, 4.03% (951, 284/23, 565, 493) of admissions were billed for one or more of the study AFs. Among admissions receiving AFs, 86% received an azole, with the most frequently used agent being fluconazole, which accounted for for 46% of total AF days. Likelihood of AF receipt during admission increased by quarter (OR 1.012, p< 0.001), controlling for length of stay, presence of fungal infection, hematologic malignancy (HM), or solid organ transplantAbstract: Background: Surveillance of antimicrobial use is a cornerstone of antimicrobial stewardship, though antifungal (AF) use is less frequently characterized. AFs are a major driver of inpatient costs and their use both reflects and drives changes in fungal susceptibility patterns. We report on trends in AF use in a large sample of United States hospitals over time including predictors of AF use. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult inpatient visits between 2016 and 2020 at hospitals contributing data to the Vizient Clinical Database/Clinical Resource Manager (www.vizientinc.com ). Inpatient use of systemically administered AFs was investigated as a function of study quarter, diagnosis code, and underlying immunosuppressive condition. Changes in AF use were modeled using logistic and negative binomial regression. Results: We examined over 23 million admissions across 470 hospitals, 43% of which were classified as teaching hospitals and 54% of which performed solid organ transplants. During the study period, 4.03% (951, 284/23, 565, 493) of admissions were billed for one or more of the study AFs. Among admissions receiving AFs, 86% received an azole, with the most frequently used agent being fluconazole, which accounted for for 46% of total AF days. Likelihood of AF receipt during admission increased by quarter (OR 1.012, p< 0.001), controlling for length of stay, presence of fungal infection, hematologic malignancy (HM), or solid organ transplant (SOT). Odds of any receipt and days of therapy (DOT) of fluconazole, isavuconazole, posaconazole, and echinocandins increased over the study period while those of voriconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine decreased; odds of receipt of amphotericin products increased while DOT decreased; flucytosine receipt odds increased while DOT did not change. Only 30% of admissions with AF use were associated with a documented fungal infection, with 93% of these episodes documented as candidiasis. Admissions associated with SOT or HM represented 2% and 3% of all patient-days, but 11% and 25% of total AF days, respectively. Antifungal Utilization Conclusion: AF use increased significantly over the study period, with changes across agents and classes. Most AF use occurred in the absence of administratively documented infection and was more common among SOT and HM patients. Disclosures: All Authors : No reported disclosures … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 8(2021)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Open forum infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 8(2021)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0008-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S184
- Page End:
- S185
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12-04
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Medical microbiology -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
616.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://ofid.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.346 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2328-8957
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21268.xml