Older and younger adults' revision of health misconceptions. Issue 2 (7th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sitzman, Danielle M.; Rheams, James; Babineau, Addison L.; Tauber, Sarah K.
• Is Part Of: Memory. Volume 30:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 172
• Page End: 189
• Publication Date: 2022-02-07
• Subjects: Aging -- knowledge revision -- error correction -- misconceptions -- older adults; Memory -- Periodicals; 153.1205
• DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1999981
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0965-8211

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Although ample younger adult research has detailed effective strategies for revising misconceptions, research with older adults is less extensive. Older adults may be less able to correct errors in knowledge due to age-related changes in cognition, but it is also possible that older adults' revision of misconceptions has been limited by methodologies which do not provide adequate support for correction. In two experiments, we examined how older and younger adults revise health-related misconceptions when provided with cognitive support in the form of explicit detailed feedback and an immediate test. Older and younger adults in Experiment 1 answered true/false health statements, received feedback with a detailed explanation of the correct response, took an additional test on the same statements immediately following the initial test, and completed a final test 1-week later. Older and younger adults corrected a similar proportion of misconceptions immediately and maintained most of those revisions across a 1-week delay. In Experiment 2, older adults corrected the same proportion of misconceptions on the final test regardless of whether or not they received a test immediately following feedback. Overall, older adults revised health misconceptions as effectively as did younger adults but variables influencing correction (e.g., belief in feedback) may differ.