A comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes with vaginal delivery: indicated induction versus spontaneous labor. (19th May 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes with vaginal delivery: indicated induction versus spontaneous labor. (19th May 2022)
- Main Title:
- A comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes with vaginal delivery: indicated induction versus spontaneous labor
- Authors:
- Whittington, Julie R.
Ounpraseuth, Songthip T.
Magann, Everett F.
Wendel, Paul J.
Newton, Lisa
Morrison, John C. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To determine if there is a difference in the maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of women undergoing a medically indicated labor induction and delivering vaginally compared to women in spontaneous labor delivering vaginally. Methods: This is a planned secondary analysis of previously published data with additional data collected for a case-control design. Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of women undergoing a medically indicated labor induction of labor and delivering vaginally were compared with the next woman who went into labor spontaneously and delivered vaginally. Results: There were 1097 women in the medically indicated labor group and 1096 women in the spontaneous labor group. The medically indicated induction group was younger ( p < .0001), had less women of "other" race ( p = .004), were of a lower gravidity and parity ( p < .0001), had a lower Bishops' score on admission ( p < .0001), had a greater proportion of umbilical arterial cord pH values <7.1 and <7.0 ( p < .0001). Additionally, the induction group had longer first and second stages of labor ( p < .0001). While the unadjusted rates of post-partum complications and NICU admission were higher in the medically indicated labor induction group, only cord gas pH <7.1 remained statistically significant after adjustment. Conclusion: Even with successful vaginal delivery of a medically indicated induction of labor, the risk for adverse outcomes remainsAbstract: Objective: To determine if there is a difference in the maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of women undergoing a medically indicated labor induction and delivering vaginally compared to women in spontaneous labor delivering vaginally. Methods: This is a planned secondary analysis of previously published data with additional data collected for a case-control design. Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of women undergoing a medically indicated labor induction of labor and delivering vaginally were compared with the next woman who went into labor spontaneously and delivered vaginally. Results: There were 1097 women in the medically indicated labor group and 1096 women in the spontaneous labor group. The medically indicated induction group was younger ( p < .0001), had less women of "other" race ( p = .004), were of a lower gravidity and parity ( p < .0001), had a lower Bishops' score on admission ( p < .0001), had a greater proportion of umbilical arterial cord pH values <7.1 and <7.0 ( p < .0001). Additionally, the induction group had longer first and second stages of labor ( p < .0001). While the unadjusted rates of post-partum complications and NICU admission were higher in the medically indicated labor induction group, only cord gas pH <7.1 remained statistically significant after adjustment. Conclusion: Even with successful vaginal delivery of a medically indicated induction of labor, the risk for adverse outcomes remains elevated. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 35:Number 10(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Number 10(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 10 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0035-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1929
- Page End:
- 1934
- Publication Date:
- 2022-05-19
- Subjects:
- Indicated induction -- spontaneous labor -- perinatal outcomes -- vaginal delivery -- length of labor
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Perinatology -- Periodicals
Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Neonatology -- Periodicals
618.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/jmf ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/14767058.2020.1774545 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1476-7058
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5012.332000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21262.xml