746. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection After a Change in Diagnostic Testing Algorithm. (4th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Crone, Andrew S; Skinner, Andrew M; Cheknis, Adam; Johnson, Stuart; Pacheco, Susan M
• Is Part Of: Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 8(2021)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S470
• Page End: S471
• Publication Date: 2021-12-04
• Subjects: Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab466.943
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-8957

Abstract

Abstract: Background: There is a lack of consensus on the most appropriate testing for C. difficile infection (CDI). The objective of this study was to determine the clinical and microbiological characteristics of CDI following a switch from stool PCR testing only to PCR reflexed to toxin testing. Figure 1. PCR Cycle Threshold Values Methods: We reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 50 consecutive patients who tested positive for CD by PCR (Xpert CD, Cepheid) between October 2019 and January 2020 at the Hines VA Hospital. Cases were defined by results of reflex toxin testing (Cdiff quick check complete, Alere/TechLab) after a positive PCR result. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, initial laboratory data, and treatments were compared as well as patient outcomes, including hospital readmission due to CDI at 30 days, and recurrent CDI (rCDI) at 30 and 90 days. The cycle threshold for the stool PCR result was recorded. Stools were cultured anaerobically for CD, and restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing was performed on the recovered CD isolates. Results: Toxin testing was positive in 19/50 (38%) cases. Compared to stool toxin-negative cases, toxin-positive cases were older (95% vs. 71% were age ≥ 65, p = 0.06), more likely to have a history of CDI (37% vs. 23%, p = 0.34), and have ≥ 1 CDI episodes within 6 months (37% vs. 19%, p = 0.26). Treatment for CDI was more common in patients who had a positive toxin text. (95% vs 61%, p= 0.009). Among the 38 patients that received treatment, 33 received vancomycin (87%) and 8 patients (21%) had rCDI at 30 days. Of the 8 patients with rCDI, 2 were re-admitted to the hospital for CDI. The average PCR cycle threshold was lower in the toxin-positive stools compared to toxin-negative stools (24.46 and 29.96, p< 0.001; Fig. 1) The endemic REA group Y was the most common CD strain recovered (30%) and the previously epidemic and virulent REA group BI strain was recovered in 11% of the cases. Conclusion: CDI cases diagnosed by positive stool PCR and positive toxin tests had more typical risk factors for CDI, a lower PCR cycle threshold and were more likely to have been treated for CDI. Outcomes were similar in this setting where infection with the virulent BI strain was uncommon. Disclosures: Stuart Johnson, MD, Acurx Pharmaceuticals (Advisor or Review Panel member)Bio-K+ (Advisor or Review Panel member)Ferring Pharmaceutical (Advisor or Review Panel member)