Enhancement rate of venous phase to portal venous phase computed tomography and its correlation with ultrasound elastography determination of liver fibrosis. Issue 2 (May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Masuda, T.; Nakaura, T.; Funama, Y.; Sato, T.; Arataki, K.; Oku, T.; Yoshiura, T.; Masuda, S.; Gotanda, R.; Arao, K.; Imaizumi, H.; Arao, S.; Hiratsuka, J.; Awai, K.
• Is Part Of: Radiography. Volume 28:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 412
• Page End: 419
• Publication Date: 2022-05
• Subjects: Liver -- Liver cirrhosis -- Elasticity imaging techniques -- Contrast media; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancer -- Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.10.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-8174

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: This study aimed to compare the correlation between the computed tomography (CT) enhancement rate of the venous to portal venous phase (VP-ER) and the extracellular volume (ECV) fraction with shear-wave ultrasound elastography (USE) findings in patients with liver fibrosis. Methods: We included 450 patients with clinically suspected liver cirrhosis who underwent triphasic dynamic CT studies and USE. We compared the USE results with the unenhanced CT phase, with enhancement in the hepatic artery phase (HAP), portal venous phase (PVP), and venous phase (VP), and with the ECV fraction and the VP-ER. We also compared the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the ECV fraction and VP-ER with that of the values obtained with USE. Results: The VP-ER was the most highly correlated with the liver stiffness value determined with USE (Pearson's correlation coefficient: r = 0.37), followed by enhancement in the PVP (r = −0.25), CT number on unenhanced CT scans (r = −0.22), the ECV fraction (r = 0.19), enhancement in the VP (r = 0.059), and enhancement in the HAP (r = −0.023) (all p < 0.01). The VP-ER showed a significantly higher AUC than the ECV fraction (0.75 vs 0.62) when the liver stiffness was >15 kPa in USE studies (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Compared to the ECV fraction, the VP-ER is more useful for predicting all degrees of liver fibrosis on routine triphasic dynamic CT images. Implications for practice: Although improvement is needed, the VP-ER has a higher diagnostic ability for liver fibrosis than the ECV fraction in clinical practice.