Comparison between gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) and compressed sensing sequences for single breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with T1 hyperintense bile. Issue 150 (May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morimoto-Ishikawa, Daisuke; Hyodo, Tomoko; Takenaka, Mamoru; Matsukubo, Yuko; Numoto, Isao; Itoh, Makoto; Ohmi, Masato; Kamata, Ken; Ueda, Yu; Wakana, Miyuki; Kudo, Masatoshi; Saito, Shigeyoshi; Ishii, Kazunari
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 150(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05
• Subjects: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography -- Bile duct -- Pancreatic duct -- Cholecystolithiasis -- Gallstones; 3D three-dimensional -- AUC area under the curve -- CBD common bile duct -- CHD common hepatic duct -- CS MRCP three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with compressed sensing -- GRASE MRCP magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with gradient and spin-echo -- ICC interclass correlation coefficient -- LHD left intrahepatic bile duct -- MRCP magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography -- RC relative duct-to-periductal contrast ratio -- RHD right intrahepatic bile duct -- ROC receiver operating characteristic -- TE echo time; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110279
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: Gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) provides better MRCP than compressed sensing (CS) in patients with T1 hyperintense bile. Relative duct-to-periductal contrast ratios of all bile duct segments are significantly lower in GRASE MRCP than in CS MRCP. GRASE MRCP has higher detectability of biliary stones than CS MRCP. Abstract: Purpose: To compare image quality and the detectability of gallstones in patients with T1 hyperintense bile between single breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) and with compressed sensing (CS). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent MRCP using GRASE and CS and had hyperintense bile on T1 -weighted fat-suppressed images. The relative duct-to-periductal contrast ratios (RCs) of each bile duct segment were calculated. Pancreaticobiliary duct visibility, motion artifacts, background suppression, and overall image quality were scored on a 5-point scale. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze differences in qualitative and quantitative results. Diagnostic performance in detecting common bile duct (CBD) and gallbladder stones was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: In total, 96 patients were included in the study. RCs of all bile duct segments in GRASE MRCP were significantly lower than those in CS MRCP ( p < 0.001). All biliary duct visibility and overall image quality had significantly higher scores in GRASE MRCP than in CS MRCP ( p < 0.001–0.003). Area under ROC curves of GRASE MRCP and CS MRCP were 1.00 and 0.88 for CBD stone ( p = 0.14) and 0.93 and 0.82 for gallbladder stone ( p = 0.08), respectively. Conclusions: GRASE MRCP provides better image quality than CS MRCP in patients with hyperintense bile on T1 -weighted images. The detectability of biliary stones was also higher in GRASE MRCP than in CS MRCP, although not significantly.