Strategies for improving the environmental performance of nickel production in China: Insight into a life cycle assessment. (15th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bai, Yueyang; Zhang, Tianzuo; Zhai, Yijie; Jia, Yuke; Ren, Ke; Hong, Jinglan
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 312(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-06-15
• Subjects: Sulphide ore -- Mining and beneficiation stages -- China -- Urban mining -- Marginal electricity structure; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114949
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: Nickel is a critical metal for global low-carbon energy transition, but its production processes require massive energy inputs and emit large amounts of pollutants. This study constructed life cycle inventories of the mainstream electrolytic nickel production chains in China at the industrial level and subsequently evaluated their environmental performance via a regionalised life cycle impact assessment method. Results show that environmental indicator results of the electrolytic nickel production from the leaching electrowinning method were 17.7%–40.2% lower than those from the grind and flotation electrolytic method. At the endpoint level, the nickel mining and beneficiation stages contributed 54.7%–65.91% of human health damage, 83.0%–84.7% of ecosystem quality damage and 80.8%–83.7% of resources damage. The key processes, including direct processes, cement input and energy consumption (e.g., electricity and coal), accounted for more than 62.1% of the impacts in the key midpoint categories. The potential environmental damage of China's nickel mining and beneficiation industry increased by 29.2% from 2010 to 2018 because of the growing trend of nickel ore demand. In the case that China's nickel metal recovery rate reaches the global average level, then approximately 3.83 × 10 2 Daly of human health damage, 59.83 Species·year of ecosystem quality damage and 1.64 × 10 8 $ of resources damage can be avoided annually. Strategies for promoting the full assimilation of renewable electricity, applying the clinker-free cemented backfill materials in the mining process, precious recovery by bioleaching from tailings and reusing waste rock as building materials are recommended. Meanwhile, extended producer responsibility should to be comprehensively implemented in the nickel-related industries to alleviate the environmental implications and nickel supply pressures from geo-mining. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Two mainstream processes for nickel metal were assessed by life cycle assessment. Grind and flotation electrolytic method contributed high environmental impacts. The mining and beneficiation stages dominated the overall environmental risks. Urban mining could reduce about 74.4% of environmental burden at endpoint level. Promoting clean energy assimilation and using cement-free material were suggested.