In or against the state? Hospitality and hostility in homelessness charities and deportation practice. Issue 1 (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dobson, Rachael; Turnbull, Sarah
• Editors: Gurnham, David
• Is Part Of: International journal of law in context. Volume 18:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 40
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: migration law -- socio-legal studies -- deportation -- homelessness -- England -- London -- Citizens' Rights Directive -- rough sleeping; 340.11505
• DOI: 10.1017/S1744552322000015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1744-5523

Abstract

Abstract: This paper examines how deportation became a solution to rough sleeping in pre-Brexit England. It identifies relationships between the social regulation of vulnerable and marginalised adults, contemporary governance arrangements and bordering practices characteristic of Britain's 'hostile environment'. Drawing on media reports and grey organisational literature, the focus of discussion is events across 2015–2018 in which three London-based charities were criticised for working with the Home Office to deport homeless migrants under its European Economic Area Administrative Removal policy. The overall tenor of criticism was that collaboration with the government compromised the organisations' independence and charitable missions and aims. This diminished their capacity to both advocate for vulnerable adults and effectively challenge oppressive state practices. The paper observes how state and nonprofit relations structure institutional and socio-legal responses to marginalised and 'othered' adults through commissioning and contracting mechanisms. It demonstrates that the social and legal control of homeless migrants may be differently constituted by institutions delivering services in relation to citizenship, vulnerability and marginalisation. This analysis incorporates a broader appraisal of institutional motivations, values and beliefs in social welfare delivery, including the historic role of charitable agencies in the criminalisation of social welfare users. Taken together, the paper offers an interdisciplinary critique of the relationships between border control, neoliberal governance and the sociocultural and historic construction of homeless migrants.