"There's so much to be done": a qualitative study to elucidate research priorities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Issue 1 (31st March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cannon, Laura; Caliendo, Anne; Hersh, Aimee; Knight, Andrea M
• Is Part Of: Lupus science & medicine. Volume 9:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03-31
• Subjects: Qualitative research -- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic -- Patient Care Team; Systemic lupus erythematosus -- Periodicals; 616.772005
• DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000659
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-8851

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: There is a pressing need for high-quality, comprehensive research to describe the natural history, best treatments, access to care and disparities in care for patients with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Building on a previously published survey study of cSLE clinicians and researchers to describe research priorities in cSLE, the primary objective of this study was to conduct expert interviews to define high-priority areas for cSLE research. Methods: Individuals with identified multidisciplinary expertise in cSLE were recruited worldwide using purposive sampling technique. Experts participated in open-ended, semistructured qualitative interviews. Interviews were designed to elicit expert perspectives on research priorities, optimal research approaches, and factors that facilitate and hinder advancing cSLE research. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and de-identified for analysis. Analysis for underlying themes of cSLE expert perspectives was performed using a constant comparative approach. Results: Twenty-nine experts with diverse clinical and research backgrounds participated. Themes emerged within five domains: (1) expanding disease knowledge; (2) investigator collaboration; (3) partnering with patients and families; (4) improving care to optimise research; and (5) overcoming investigator barriers. Choosing a singular area of focus was difficult; experts identified many competing priorities. Despite the numerous priorities that emerged, experts described several existing and potential opportunities for advancing cSLE research. Conclusions: In addition to the priorities identified by cSLE experts in this study, the opportunities for advancing cSLE research and care that were proposed should be used as a foundation for creation of a cSLE research agenda for both research and funding allocation.