Management of amended variant classification laboratory reports by genetic counselors in the United States and Canada: An exploratory study. Issue 2 (27th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Richardson, Brooke; Fitzgerald‐Butt, Sara M.; Spoonamore, Katherine G.; Wetherill, Leah; Helm, Benjamin M.; Breman, Amy M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of genetic counseling. Volume 31:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 479
• Page End: 488
• Publication Date: 2021-09-27
• Subjects: amended reports -- genetic counselors -- genetic testing -- laboratory reporting -- variant classification -- workplace practices; Genetic counseling -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1514
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1059-7700

Abstract

Abstract: For the past two decades, the guidelines put forth by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) detailing providers' clinical responsibility to recontact patients have remained mostly unchanged, despite evolving variant interpretation practices which have yielded substantial rates of reclassification and amended reports. In fact, there is little information regarding genetic counselors' roles in informing patients of reclassified variants, or the process by which these amended reports are currently being handled. In this study, we developed a survey to measure current experiences with amended variant reports and preferences for ideal management, which was completed by 96 genetic counselors from the United States and Canada. All respondents indicated they were the individuals responsible for disclosing initial positive genetic testing results and any clinically actionable reclassified variant reports, and over half (56%) received at least a few amended variant reports each year. Nearly a quarter (20/87) of respondents reported having a standard operating procedure (SOP) for managing amended reports and all were very satisfied (12/20) or satisfied (8/20) with the SOP. Of those without a protocol, 76% (51/67) would prefer to have an SOP implemented. Respondents reported a preference for (1) laboratories to send amended variant reports directly to the genetic counselor or ordering physician through email or an online portal, and (2) notification to patients ideally occurring through a phone call. In the event that the original genetic counselor is inaccessible, respondents reported a preference for reports to be sent directly to another genetic counselor (36%) on the team or the clinic in general (27%). Information from this study provides insight into the current practices of genetic counselors as applied to amended reports and what improvements may increase the efficiency of the reporting process. Moreover, these results suggest a need for an updated statement addressing duty to recontact, specifically as it applies to amended variant reports.