Forest canopy nitrogen uptake can supply entire foliar demand. (14th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ferraretto, Daniele; Nair, Richard; Shah, Nadeem W.; Reay, Dave; Mencuccini, Maurizio; Spencer, Michael; Heal, Kate V.
• Is Part Of: Functional ecology. Volume 36:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 933
• Page End: 949
• Publication Date: 2022-02-14
• Subjects: 15N trace -- canopy fertilisation -- canopy nitrogen uptake -- ecosystem nitrogen fluxes -- nitrogen deposition -- Sitka spruce; Ecology -- Periodicals; 574.505
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-8463

Abstract

Abstract: Plant canopies intercept, process and potentially assimilate atmospheric nitrogen (N) additions, but the forest‐scale effects of canopy processes on N cycling and plant nutrition are not clear. Substantial method artefacts and scaling issues exist in previous experimental studies which measure relevant N fluxes either at (a) natural abundance, (b) via a 15 N tracer or (c) by incorporation of additional 15 N into measured biomass, meaning these processes are often overlooked or discounted. Here, working in a mature Sitka spruce plantation and under ambient conditions, we used all three of these methods independently at stand, tree and branch scale to assess the effects of canopy interception on capture, assimilation and incorporation of inorganic N deposition by canopy biomass. We consistently found that above 70% of N deposition was unaccounted for (i.e. assimilated, processed beyond detectability, volatilised or retained) when passing through the canopy, independent of the assessment method. Using short‐term 15 N tracers, we found that this unaccounted N was retained in canopy tissues. Apparent uptake from monitoring of ecohydrological fluxes was sustained and consistent, suggesting that the tree canopies were a sink for N deposition. Seasonal variation in NO 3 ‐ recovery also suggested biological activities influenced fluxes and transformations of this ion within the canopy. The total amount of this canopy N uptake was greater than the mean annual N in litterfall, implying that this flux was supporting the turnover of the canopy. When we used 15 N to directly assess uptake into branch biomass we also did not find evidence for immediate relocation to other parts of the tree. Our findings suggest that at our N‐limited site, canopy uptake of N deposition is likely to be as important as root uptake of N but may be limited to supplying N to the canopy rather than the whole tree. Further research in this area is crucial to better understand the interactions of future changes in N deposition on primary production and carbon storage in forests. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. Abstract : A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.