Evaluation of three immunological assays to mitigate the risk of transboundary spread of Coxiella burnetii by alpacas. Issue 2 (31st March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tellis, Anastasia N.; Rowe, Sam M.; Coilparampil, Ronald; Jenkins, Cheryl; Dart, Andrew; Zadoks, Ruth N.; Regnerus, Corey D.; Bosward, Katrina L.
• Is Part Of: Transboundary and emerging diseases. Volume 69:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 793
• Page End: 804
• Publication Date: 2021-03-31
• Subjects: alpaca -- antibodies -- Coxiella burnetii -- immunoassay -- latent class analysis -- Q fever; Veterinary medicine -- Periodicals; 636.089
• DOI: 10.1111/tbed.14051
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1865-1674

Abstract

Abstract: Coxiella burnetii causes coxiellosis in animals and Q fever in humans, a potentially debilitating zoonotic disease commonly transmitted through domestic ruminants. To prevent transboundary spread of C. burnetii, animals may be tested prior to export. In alpacas, this process is complicated by the lack of scientific evidence for C. burnetii infection in the species, and the unique composition of camelid antibodies, which may cause false‐positive results in assays developed for ruminants. We evaluated a complement fixation test (CFT; currently recommended for alpacas in New Zealand), an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Positive analytical control samples were generated through vaccination of alpacas with a human Q fever vaccine, whereas negative analytical control samples were sourced from New Zealand (deemed free of C. burnetii ). Immunological assays were conducted on 131 alpaca sera submitted for export testing. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) for CFT, ELISA and IFA were determined using Bayesian latent class analysis. Due to anticomplementary activity, 37 (28.2%) of the CFT results were inconclusive, making CFT unsuitable for routine use. Of the remaining 94 samples, 10.6%, 0% and 7.4% were positive for C. burnetii antibodies based on CFT, ELISA and IFA, respectively, yielding estimated sensitivities of 58%, 26% and 78%, and estimated specificities of 95%, 98% and 95%, with the estimates for sensitivity being imprecise, as evidenced by wide 95% credible intervals. Positive predictive values were similar across assays, albeit very low at the estimated seroprevalence of 5%. Our results indicate that, of the tests available, IFA appears to be the most appropriate for use in alpacas. Higher sensitivity of antibody detection, use of antigen detection assays and availability of samples from individuals with evidence of infection could provide additional insight into the risk of transboundary spread of C. burnetii by alpacas.