Multi‐population puma connectivity could restore genomic diversity to at‐risk coastal populations in California. (27th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gustafson, Kyle D.; Gagne, Roderick B.; Buchalski, Michael R.; Vickers, T. Winston; Riley, Seth P. D.; Sikich, Jeff A.; Rudd, Jaime L.; Dellinger, Justin A.; LaCava, Melanie E. F.; Ernest, Holly B.
• Is Part Of: Evolutionary applications. Volume 15:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 286
• Page End: 299
• Publication Date: 2022-01-27
• Subjects: conservation genetics -- mountain lion -- nested population structure -- population genetics -- Puma concolor -- SNP; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Genetics -- Periodicals; Natural selection -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1111/eva.13341
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-4571

Abstract

Abstract: Urbanization is decreasing wildlife habitat and connectivity worldwide, including for apex predators, such as the puma ( Puma concolor ). Puma populations along California's central and southern coastal habitats have experienced rapid fragmentation from development, leading to calls for demographic and genetic management. To address urgent conservation genomic concerns, we used double‐digest restriction‐site associated DNA (ddRAD) sequencing to analyze 16, 285 genome‐wide single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 401 pumas sampled broadly across the state. Our analyses indicated support for 4–10 geographically nested, broad‐ to fine‐scale genetic clusters. At the broadest scale, the four genetic clusters had high genetic diversity and exhibited low linkage disequilibrium, indicating that pumas have retained genomic diversity statewide. However, multiple lines of evidence indicated substructure, including 10 finer‐scale genetic clusters, some of which exhibited fixed alleles and linkage disequilibrium. Fragmented populations along the Southern Coast and Central Coast had particularly low genetic diversity and strong linkage disequilibrium, indicating genetic drift and close inbreeding. Our results demonstrate that genetically at risk populations are typically nested within a broader‐scale group of interconnected populations that collectively retain high genetic diversity and heterogenous fixations. Thus, extant variation at the broader scale has potential to restore diversity to local populations if management actions can enhance vital gene flow and recombine locally sequestered genetic diversity. These state‐ and genome‐wide results are critically important for science‐based conservation and management practices. Our nested population genomic analysis highlights the information that can be gained from population genomic studies aiming to provide guidance for the conservation of fragmented populations.