Home parenteral nutrition in older vs younger patients: Clinical characteristics and outcomes. Issue 2 (4th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Daoud, Dane Christina; Cartagena, Elena M. S.; Schwenger, Katherine J. P.; Somlaw, Nicha; Gramlich, Leah; Whittaker, Scott; Armstrong, David; Jurewitsch, Brian; Raman, Matreyi; Duerksen, Donald R.; McHattie, James D.; Allard, Johane P.
• Is Part Of: JPEN, Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. Volume 46:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 348
• Page End: 356
• Publication Date: 2021-05-04
• Subjects: catheter‐related bloodstream infections -- elderly -- home parenteral nutrition -- Karnofsky Performance Status; Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals; Enteral feeding -- Periodicals; 615.85484
• DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2117
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-6071

Abstract

Abstract: Background: There is a demographic shift toward older patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN), but data on clinical outcomes are limited. The objective of this study was to determine differences between older and younger HPN patients in regard to HPN indications, prescriptions, and outcomes over the first 2 years receiving HPN. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from HPN adult patients entered in the Canadian HPN Registry. New HPN patients enrolled between 2003 and 2017 and receiving HPN for at least 2 years were selected. Data included demographics, PN prescriptions, catheter‐related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) over the past year, survival, and quality of life based on Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Results: Four hundred two patients were included: 184 patients were ≥60 years old, and 219 patients were between 18 and 59 years old. There were no differences in the main indications for HPN, body mass index (BMI), and PN prescriptions at baseline. At 2 years, younger patients received more energy from PN than older patients (27.9 vs 19.6 kcal/kg; P < .001), but BMI remained comparable. There were fewer CRBSIs in the older group (20% vs 36%, P = .0023), but 78% of younger patients remained alive vs 69% in the older group ( P = .0401). In those alive, the proportion of patients continuing to receive HPN was comparable and the proportion of patients with a KPS ≥60. Conclusions: Older HPN patients have similar clinical characteristics as younger patients but have fewer CRBSIs and higher 2‐year mortality.