Conservation after Sovereignty: Deconstructing Australian Policies against Horses with a Plea and Proposal. (2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Castelló, Pablo P.; Santiago-Ávila, Francisco J.
• Is Part Of: Hypatia. Volume 37:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 136
• Page End: 163
• Publication Date: 2022
• Subjects: Feminist theory -- Periodicals; Feminism -- United States -- Periodicals; Femininity (Philosophy) -- Periodicals; 305.4201
• DOI: 10.1017/hyp.2021.72
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0887-5367

Abstract

Abstract: Conservation scholarship and policies are concerned with the viability of idealized ecological communities constructed using human metrics. We argue that the discipline of conservation assumes an epistemology and ethics of human sovereignty/dominion over animals that leads to violent actions against animals. We substantiate our argument by deconstructing a case study. In the context of recent bushfires in Australia, we examine recent legislation passed by the parliament of New South Wales (NSW), policy documents, and academic articles by conservationists that support breaking communities of horses and/or killing 4, 000 horses in Kosciuszko National Park (KNP), NSW. Theoretically framing our deconstruction against human sovereignty over animals and anthropocentrism, we affirm an intersectional, ecofeminist approach that values animals as relational and vulnerable agents. We uncover first the epistemic violence of categorizing horses as "pests, " and the anthropocentric nature of recently passed legislation in NSW. We analyze next the deficient ethics of NSW's government, and the argument that killing animals is justifiable when they suffer from starvation and dehydration. We close with a realistic proposal that does not involve breaking horses' communities and/or killing horses, and a plea to the government of NSW and conservationists not to harm any horses in KNP.