Improving the assessment of the probability of success in late stage drug development. (14th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hampson, Lisa V.; Bornkamp, Björn; Holzhauer, Björn; Kahn, Joseph; Lange, Markus R.; Luo, Wen‐Lin; Cioppa, Giovanni Della; Stott, Kelvin; Ballerstedt, Steffen
• Is Part Of: Pharmaceutical statistics. Volume 21:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 439
• Page End: 459
• Publication Date: 2021-12-14
• Subjects: Bayesian methods -- expert elicitation -- meta‐analysis -- quantitative decision making; Pharmacy -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Pharmacy -- Statistics -- Periodicals; 615.10727
• DOI: 10.1002/pst.2179
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1539-1604

Abstract

Abstract: There are several steps to confirming the safety and efficacy of a new medicine. A sequence of trials, each with its own objectives, is usually required. Quantitative risk metrics can be useful for informing decisions about whether a medicine should transition from one stage of development to the next. To obtain an estimate of the probability of regulatory approval, pharmaceutical companies may start with industry‐wide success rates and then apply to these subjective adjustments to reflect program‐specific information. However, this approach lacks transparency and fails to make full use of data from previous clinical trials. We describe a quantitative Bayesian approach for calculating the probability of success (PoS) at the end of phase II which incorporates internal clinical data from one or more phase IIb studies, industry‐wide success rates, and expert opinion or external data if needed. Using an example, we illustrate how PoS can be calculated accounting for differences between the phase II data and future phase III trials, and discuss how the methods can be extended to accommodate accelerated drug development pathways.