A comparison of tuberculous and bacterial native joint septic arthritis infections in a retrospective cohort: Presentation characteristics, outcomes and long term follow up. (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison of tuberculous and bacterial native joint septic arthritis infections in a retrospective cohort: Presentation characteristics, outcomes and long term follow up. (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- A comparison of tuberculous and bacterial native joint septic arthritis infections in a retrospective cohort: Presentation characteristics, outcomes and long term follow up
- Authors:
- William Goodall, Jack
James Patterson, Benjamin
Barrett, Jessica
Colquhoun, Matthew
Williamson, Sarah
Clayton-Smith, Ana
Koh, Gavin
Corrah, Tumena - Abstract:
- Highlights: Patients with bacterial versus tuberculous septic arthritis had significantly higher CRP levels and neutrophil counts. A CRP level above 100 mg/L conferred an odds ratio of 46 for bacterial infection. 51% of bacterial septic arthritis cases were asymptomatic at last follow up compared to 72% of tuberculous cases. Abstract: Objectives: This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to characterise and compare the demographics, initial laboratory tests and outcomes between patients with large-joint bacterial septic arthritis (BSA) and tuberculous septic arthritis (TBSA). Methods: All patients with a culture from a large, native joint growing either non-mycobacterial bacteria or Mycobacterium tuberculosis between 1 January 2012 and 1 October 2018 in our institution were included. Clinical details and admission laboratory values were obtained from patient records. Comparisons were made by Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared tests, and logistic regression analysis. Results: We identified 64 BSA and 29 TBSA. On average, the BSA cases were older, had higher CRP levels and neutrophil counts and lower albumin levels. The odds ratio for having a BSA was 46 in cases with a CRP greater than 100 mg/L (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5–850, p < 0.001) and 24 with a neutrophil count greater than 7.5x10 9 (95% CI 6.1–160, p < 0.001). 51% of BSA were asymptomatic at last follow up compared to 72% of TBSA. 14% of the BSA cases died during admission; there were no deaths in the TBSAHighlights: Patients with bacterial versus tuberculous septic arthritis had significantly higher CRP levels and neutrophil counts. A CRP level above 100 mg/L conferred an odds ratio of 46 for bacterial infection. 51% of bacterial septic arthritis cases were asymptomatic at last follow up compared to 72% of tuberculous cases. Abstract: Objectives: This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to characterise and compare the demographics, initial laboratory tests and outcomes between patients with large-joint bacterial septic arthritis (BSA) and tuberculous septic arthritis (TBSA). Methods: All patients with a culture from a large, native joint growing either non-mycobacterial bacteria or Mycobacterium tuberculosis between 1 January 2012 and 1 October 2018 in our institution were included. Clinical details and admission laboratory values were obtained from patient records. Comparisons were made by Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared tests, and logistic regression analysis. Results: We identified 64 BSA and 29 TBSA. On average, the BSA cases were older, had higher CRP levels and neutrophil counts and lower albumin levels. The odds ratio for having a BSA was 46 in cases with a CRP greater than 100 mg/L (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5–850, p < 0.001) and 24 with a neutrophil count greater than 7.5x10 9 (95% CI 6.1–160, p < 0.001). 51% of BSA were asymptomatic at last follow up compared to 72% of TBSA. 14% of the BSA cases died during admission; there were no deaths in the TBSA group. Conclusions: Significant differences exist between patients with BSA and TBSA. Whilst no test is sufficient to exclude BSA, a raised neutrophil count or a CRP greater than 100 mg/L significantly increases the odds of a bacterial aetiology. Patients with BSA had worse long-term outcomes and higher incidence of inpatient mortality. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infection in practice. Volume 13(2022)
- Journal:
- Clinical infection in practice
- Issue:
- Volume 13(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 13, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0013-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- Mycobacteria -- Joint infection -- Septic arthritis
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
Communicable Diseases
Infections
Communicable diseases
Infection
Electronic journals
Periodical
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/clinical-infection-in-practice ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clinpr.2022.100138 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2590-1702
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 21159.xml